Impact of multipoint pacing on projected battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy. An IRON‐MPP study sub‐analysis

Multipoint pacing (MPP) may improve clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT‐D), but its impact on battery longevity in a real‐world population has not been investigated in large trials.

[1]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I. , 2019, European heart journal.

[2]  P. Khairy,et al.  Benefits of Multisite/Multipoint Pacing to Improve Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response. , 2019, Cardiac electrophysiology clinics.

[3]  Jagmeet P. Singh,et al.  Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming. , 2018, Heart rhythm.

[4]  M. A. Arias,et al.  Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  Jagmeet P. Singh,et al.  Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial , 2016, European heart journal.

[6]  L. Di Biase,et al.  Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP) , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[8]  Ó. Cano,et al.  The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[10]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  A. Auricchio,et al.  20 years of cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Stuart P. Rosenberg,et al.  A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study. , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[14]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[15]  Ellen Aagaard Nohr,et al.  Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark , 2013, European heart journal.

[16]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  Acute effects of multisite left ventricular pacing on mechanical dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2013, Journal of cardiac failure.

[17]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.

[19]  P. Khairy,et al.  Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[21]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[22]  A. Moss,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with minimal heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Chung,et al.  Complication Rates Associated With Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacements and Upgrade Procedures: Results From the REPLACE Registry , 2010, Circulation.

[24]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Systematic Review: Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.