Understanding the Importance of Dynamic Landscape Connectivity

Landscape connectivity is increasingly promoted as a conservation tool to combat the negative effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, and climate change. Given its importance as a key conservation strategy, connectivity science is a rapidly growing discipline. However, most landscape connectivity models consider connectivity for only a single snapshot in time, despite the widespread recognition that landscapes and ecological processes are dynamic. In this paper, we discuss the emergence of dynamic connectivity and the importance of including dynamism in connectivity models and assessments. We outline dynamic processes for both structural and functional connectivity at multiple spatiotemporal scales and provide examples of modeling approaches at each of these scales. We highlight the unique challenges that accompany the adoption of dynamic connectivity for conservation management and planning in the context of traditional conservation prioritization approaches. With the increased availability of time series and species movement data, computational capacity, and an expanding number of empirical examples in the literature, incorporating dynamic processes into connectivity models is more feasible than ever. Here, we articulate how dynamism is an intrinsic component of connectivity and integral to the future of connectivity science.

[1]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Megan K. Jennings,et al.  Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes , 2020, Land.

[3]  M. Wimberly Species Dynamics in Disturbed Landscapes: When does a Shifting Habitat Mosaic Enhance Connectivity? , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  K. Zeller,et al.  Black bears alter movements in response to anthropogenic features with time of day and season , 2019, Movement Ecology.

[5]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[6]  W. Ripple,et al.  Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes , 2017, Nature.

[7]  William F Fagan,et al.  Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[8]  P H Harvey,et al.  THE NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL OF BIRDS , 1982 .

[9]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES: DO RESERVES WORK AND DOES RESERVE SIZE MATTER? , 2003 .

[10]  Mark Broich,et al.  Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[12]  C. Wright,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. , 2010, Ecology.

[13]  D P Faith,et al.  Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Christina M. Kennedy,et al.  Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient , 2019, Global change biology.

[16]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatio‐temporal connectivity: assessing the amount of reachable habitat in dynamic landscapes , 2017 .

[17]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[18]  M. Tulbure,et al.  Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Carrie A. Schloss,et al.  New concepts, models, and assessments of climate-wise connectivity , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[20]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[21]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Dynamic refugia and species persistence: tracking spatial shifts in habitat through time , 2010 .

[22]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Graph theoretic topology of the Great but small Barrier Reef world , 2010, Theoretical Ecology.

[23]  James E Hines,et al.  Connectivity in an Agricultural Landscape as Reflected by Interpond Movements of a Freshwater Turtle , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[25]  Astrid J.A. van Teeffelen,et al.  Species in a dynamic world: Consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning , 2012 .

[26]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[27]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[28]  Scott G. Leibowitz,et al.  Temporal connectivity in a prairie pothole complex , 2003, Wetlands.

[29]  R. Gregory,et al.  Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  J. Lawler,et al.  Distribution and protection of climatic refugia in North America , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[32]  Ellen O. Aikens,et al.  The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[33]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[34]  C. Field,et al.  The velocity of climate change , 2009, Nature.

[35]  Megan K. Jennings,et al.  Puma response to the effects of fire and urbanization , 2016 .

[36]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  The Potential Connectivity of Waterhole Networks and the Effectiveness of a Protected Area under Various Drought Scenarios , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Ongoing accumulation of plant diversity through habitat connectivity in an 18-year experiment , 2019, Science.

[38]  F. Allendorf,et al.  What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[39]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  Marisa C. W. Lim,et al.  Climate change refugia and habitat connectivity promote species persistence , 2017, Climate Change Responses.

[41]  Nick M Haddad,et al.  Ecological Connectivity for a Changing Climate , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  Mirela G. Tulbure,et al.  Impact of hydroclimatic variability on regional-scale landscape connectivity across a dynamic dryland region , 2017, Ecological Indicators.

[43]  M. Saastamoinen,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics in a changing climate: Increasing spatial synchrony in weather conditions drives metapopulation synchrony of a butterfly inhabiting a fragmented landscape , 2018, Global change biology.

[44]  R. Ohlemüller,et al.  Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming , 2011, Science.

[45]  Yuval R. Zelnik,et al.  The Impact of Spatial and Temporal Dimensions of Disturbances on Ecosystem Stability , 2018, bioRxiv.

[46]  R. Cowen,et al.  Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[47]  D. McCullough,et al.  Elevation and connectivity define genetic refugia for mountain sheep as climate warms , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[48]  N. McIntyre,et al.  The challenge of assaying landscape connectivity in a changing world: A 27-year case study in the southern Great Plains (USA) playa network , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[49]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Setting Conservation Priorities , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  S. Vavrus,et al.  Identifying climatic analogs for Wisconsin under 21st-century climate-change scenarios , 2012, Climatic Change.

[51]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Connecting today's climates to future climate analogs to facilitate movement of species under climate change , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Climatic, topographic, and anthropogenic factors determine connectivity between current and future climate analogs in North America , 2018, Global change biology.

[53]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  Peter H. Singleton,et al.  Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[55]  J. Cole Smith,et al.  Conservation under uncertainty: Optimal network protection strategies for worst-case disturbance events , 2015 .

[56]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  Characteristic Spatial and Temporal Scales Unify Models of Animal Movement , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms , 2010 .

[58]  Maureen C. Kennedy,et al.  Scaling and Complexity in Landscape Ecology , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[59]  Kaitlyn M. Gaynor,et al.  Landscapes of Fear: Spatial Patterns of Risk Perception and Response. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Mirela G. Tulbure,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water networks across a global biodiversity hotspot—implications for conservation , 2014 .

[61]  E. Muths,et al.  Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology. , 2018, Ecology.

[62]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Dynamics at Broad ScalesEcosystems and landscapes , 1995 .

[64]  M. Fortin,et al.  Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape‐genetic studies of gene flow , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[65]  Paul Beier,et al.  Use of land facets to design linkages for climate change. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[66]  Naiara Pinto,et al.  Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[67]  Yuhong He,et al.  Using multiple metrics to estimate seasonal landscape connectivity for Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in a fragmented landscape , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[68]  Caz M Taylor Effects of Natal Dispersal and Density-Dependence on Connectivity Patterns and Population Dynamics in a Migratory Network , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[69]  K. Beard,et al.  A Meta‐Analytic Review of Corridor Effectiveness , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[70]  Victoria J. Burton,et al.  Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment , 2016, Science.

[71]  G. Perry,et al.  How does temporal variation in habitat connectivity influence metapopulation dynamics? , 2019, Oikos.

[72]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[73]  S. G. Marinone,et al.  Dynamic connectivity patterns from an insular marine protected area in the Gulf of California , 2014 .

[74]  J. Irisson,et al.  Biophysical modelling to investigate the effects of climate change on marine population dispersal and connectivity , 2010 .

[75]  J. Resasco Meta-analysis on a Decade of Testing Corridor Efficacy: What New Have we Learned? , 2019, Current Landscape Ecology Reports.

[76]  R. Ptáčník,et al.  Habitat loss over six decades accelerates regional and local biodiversity loss via changing landscape connectance , 2019, Ecology letters.

[77]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Consistent scaling of population structure across landscapes despite intraspecific variation in movement and connectivity. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[78]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Melissa M. Foley,et al.  Human impacts on connectivity in marine and freshwater ecosystems assessed using graph theory: a review , 2016 .

[80]  Brad H McRae,et al.  Connectivity Planning to Address Climate Change , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[81]  M. WallisDeVries,et al.  Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and colonization: significance for dispersal under climate change , 2011, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[82]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems , 2015, Science Advances.

[83]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Dynamic connectivity of temporary wetlands in the southern Great Plains , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[84]  J. Olden,et al.  Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[86]  Katharine Hayhoe,et al.  Climate forcing of wetland landscape connectivity in the Great Plains , 2014 .

[87]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[88]  P. Beier,et al.  Thirty years of connectivity conservation planning: an assessment of factors influencing plan implementation , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[89]  M. Fortin,et al.  Importance of spatio–temporal connectivity to maintain species experiencing range shifts , 2020, Ecography.

[90]  S. Aviron,et al.  Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[91]  Matthew V. Talluto,et al.  Extinction debt and colonization credit delay range shifts of eastern North American trees , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[92]  David G Angeler,et al.  The role of reserves and anthropogenic habitats for functional connectivity and resilience of ephemeral wetlands. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[93]  Robert J. Fletcher,et al.  Divergent Perspectives on Landscape Connectivity Reveal Consistent Effects from Genes to Communities , 2016 .

[94]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Projecting current and future location, quality, and connectivity of habitat for breeding birds in the Great Basin , 2014 .

[95]  I. Hanski Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes , 1999 .