Improved zero-order fringe positioning algorithms in white light interference based atomic force microscopy

Abstract In white light interference based atomic force microscopy (WLIAFM), the vertical displacement of the probe is obtained by zero-order fringe positioning on the probe cantilever, so the accuracy of zero-order fringe positioning will affect directly that of the WLIAFM. However, due to non-uniform distribution of light intensity and photoelectric noises, accurate zero-order fringe positioning becomes a problem. In this paper, two algorithms are proposed to improve the zero-order fringe positioning accuracy. In the first algorithm which is called improved maximum algorithm, multi-row maximum positions of the interference fringes are obtained and error theory is applied to eliminate erroneous maximum positions, then the average of remaining maximum positions is used as the zero-order fringe position. Another is called phase evaluation algorithm, in which wavelet transform is applied to eliminate effects from disturbances mentioned above and Hilbert transform is used for phase evaluation to obtain the zero-order fringe position. The practicability and accuracy of the two algorithms have been verified by series of experiments. The experiment results indicate that both two algorithms are suitable in this condition and the phase evaluation algorithm has higher accuracy while the improved maximum algorithm has higher processing speed.

[1]  Zainul Abdin Jaffery,et al.  Improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in digital holography using wavelet transform , 2008 .

[2]  Mahendra P. Kothiyal,et al.  Evaluation of spectral phase in spectrally resolved white-light interferometry: Comparative study of single-frame techniques , 2009 .

[3]  Bo Hsiao,et al.  Automatic surface inspection using wavelet reconstruction , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Kieran G. Larkin,et al.  Efficient nonlinear algorithm for envelope detection in white light interferometry , 1996 .

[5]  Yulong Li,et al.  De-noising of digital image correlation based on stationary wavelet transform , 2017 .

[6]  B. T. Meggitt,et al.  Digital signal-processing techniques for electronically scanned optical-fiber white-light interferometry. , 1992, Applied optics.

[7]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression , 2023 .

[8]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Two methods for display of high contrast images , 1999, TOGS.

[9]  B V Dorrío,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Phase-evaluation methods in whole-field optical measurement techniques , 1999 .

[10]  Wenjun Yang,et al.  A Novel White Light Interference Based AFM Head , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  Waion Wong,et al.  Modified Hilbert transformation method for fringe pattern analysis , 2001, International Conference on Experimental Mechanics.

[12]  Wenlong Lu,et al.  Speckle-noise-reduction method of projecting interferometry fringes based on power spectrum density. , 2012, Applied optics.

[13]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Comparison of Fourier transform, windowed Fourier transform, and wavelet transform methods for phase extraction from a single fringe pattern in fringe projection profilometry , 2010 .

[14]  A. Enis Çetin,et al.  Signal recovery from wavelet transform maxima , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Pavel Pavliček,et al.  White-light interferometry—Envelope detection by Hilbert transform and influence of noise , 2012 .

[16]  Jim Kramer,et al.  Determination of fringe order in white-light interference microscopy. , 2002, Applied optics.

[17]  P Sandoz,et al.  Wavelet transform as a processing tool in white-light interferometry. , 1997, Optics letters.

[18]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Wavelet transform domain filters: a spatially selective noise filtration technique , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  N. B. Ingleby,et al.  Treatment of Gross Errors Using Maximum Probability Theory , 1992 .

[20]  T. Thundat,et al.  Calibration of optical cantilever deflection readers , 2004 .