Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.

PURPOSE One of the main obstacles for reliable quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is the need for accurate knowledge of the arterial input function (AIF). This is a special challenge for preclinical small animal applications where it is very difficult to measure the AIF. avoiding partial volume and flow artifacts. Furthermore, using advanced pharmacokinetic models (allowing estimation of blood flow and permeability-surface area product in addition to the classical perfusion parameters) poses stricter requirements on the accuracy and precision of AIF estimation. This paper addresses small animal DCE-MRI with advanced pharmacokinetic models and presents a method for estimation of the AIF based on blind deconvolution. METHODS A parametric AIF model designed for small animal physiology and use of advanced pharmacokinetic models is proposed. The parameters of the AIF are estimated using multichannel blind deconvolution. RESULTS Evaluation on simulated data show that for realistic signal to noise ratios blind deconvolution AIF estimation leads to comparable results as the use of the true AIF. Evaluation on real data based on DCE-MRI with two contrast agents of different molecular weights showed a consistence with the known effects of the molecular weight. CONCLUSION Multi-channel blind deconvolution using the proposed AIF model specific for small animal DCE-MRI provides reliable perfusion parameter estimates under realistic signal to noise conditions.

[1]  L. Nabors,et al.  High‐resolution longitudinal assessment of flow and permeability in mouse glioma vasculature: Sequential small molecule and SPIO dynamic contrast agent MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Michal Bartoš,et al.  The precision of DCE-MRI using the tissue homogeneity model with continuous formulation of the perfusion parameters. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Zhuxian Zhou,et al.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance cancer imaging. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[4]  D. Drost,et al.  Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J. Bussink,et al.  Improved Evaluation of Antivascular Cancer Therapy Using Constrained Tracer-Kinetic Modeling for Multiagent Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. , 2018, Cancer research.

[6]  Joël Mispelter,et al.  Simultaneous dynamic T1 and T2* measurement for AIF assessment combined with DCE MRI in a mouse tumor model , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Steven Sourbron,et al.  T2*‐relaxivity contrast imaging: First results , 2013, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[9]  Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al.  Practical Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Small Animal Models of Cancer: Data Acquisition, Data Analysis, and Interpretation , 2012, Pharmaceutics.

[10]  Marleen Verhoye,et al.  Assessment of the neovascular permeability in glioma xenografts by dynamic T1 MRI with Gadomer‐17 , 2002, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[11]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Blind deconvolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ultrasound , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  T. Taxt,et al.  Anti-VEGF treatment reduces blood supply and increases tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  L. Delrue,et al.  Assessment of neovascular permeability in a pancreatic tumor model using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with contrast agents of different molecular weights , 2011, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[14]  D M Shames,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Alan Jackson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology , 2005 .

[16]  T. Taxt,et al.  Using Single-Channel Blind Deconvolution to Choose the Most Realistic Pharmacokinetic Model in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging , 2015 .

[17]  R. Reed,et al.  Compliance of the interstitial space in rats. I. Studies on hindlimb skeletal muscle. , 1981, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  Michal Bartoš,et al.  Distributed capillary adiabatic tissue homogeneity model in parametric multi‐channel blind AIF estimation using DCE‐MRI , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  T S Koh,et al.  Issues of discontinuity in the impulse residue function for deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Edward V R Dibella,et al.  Model‐based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)‐MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Hui Tang,et al.  Measurement of Murine Single‐Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J. Bankson,et al.  Fast, reproducible measurement of the vascular input function in mice using constrained reconstruction and cardiac sampling , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[23]  T. Taxt,et al.  Lack of functional normalisation of tumour vessels following anti-angiogenic therapy in glioblastoma , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[24]  Steven P Sourbron,et al.  Classic models for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  J. Gore,et al.  A quantitative comparison of the influence of individual versus population‐derived vascular input functions on dynamic contrast enhanced‐MRI in small animals , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  A. D. Hendriks,et al.  Quantitative first‐pass perfusion MRI of the mouse myocardium , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Matthias C. Schabel A unified impulse response model for DCE‐MRI , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  K. B. Larson,et al.  Tracer-Kinetic Models for Measuring Cerebral Blood Flow Using Externally Detected Radiotracers , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[29]  D L Buckley,et al.  Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Edward V R DiBella,et al.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Johannes Buurman,et al.  Effects of reference tissue AIF derived from low temporal resolution DCE-MRI data on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation , 2010 .

[32]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  A novel approach to tracer‐kinetic modeling for (macromolecular) dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2016, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[33]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  R. Brasch,et al.  Effect of varying the molecular weight of the MR contrast agent Gd‐DTPA‐polylysine on blood pharmacokinetics and enhancement patterns , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  Brian Middleton,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of vascular changes induced by the VEGF-signalling inhibitor ZD4190 in human tumour xenografts. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  T S Koh,et al.  The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  D. Buckley,et al.  Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[39]  R. Lucht,et al.  Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.