Binaural modulation detection interference.

The ability to detect amplitude modulation (AM) of a tonal probe can be disrupted by the presence of modulated masking tones. Two experiments examined whether a disparity in the interaural parameters of the probe and masker can reduce the amount of interference. In the first experiment, the effects of interaural time and intensity differences were studied in separate sets of conditions. With low-frequency carriers, the detection of 10-Hz probe modulation in the presence of 10-Hz masker modulation was not significantly affected by interaural time differences. With higher-frequency carriers, dichotic stimuli were generated through combinations of diotic, dichotic, or monotic probe and masker presentations in which the probe and masker did not share a common interaural intensity difference. In these conditions, the amount of interference was affected by the interaural configuration. However, monotic level differences between the probe and masker may have contributed to the effect of interaural configuration. In the second experiment, the probe and masker were presented through separate speakers in an enclosed listening environment. Spatial separation between the sources for the probe and masker led to a small reduction in the amount of interference. When the masker modulation rate was varied with the probe AM rate fixed at 10 Hz, the extent of tuning in the modulation domain in the sound-field conditions was similar to that obtained with diotic stimulus presentation over headphones.

[1]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Dye,et al.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: the effects of number and spacing of components, onset asynchrony, and harmonicity. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W A Yost,et al.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J H Grose,et al.  Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI). , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  W A Yost,et al.  Stimulus classification procedure for assessing the extent to which binaural processing is spectrally analytic or synthetic. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Observer weighting of concurrent binaural information. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  T N Buell,et al.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Monotic and dichotic modulation detection interference in practiced and unpracticed subjects. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection interference under conditions favoring within- or across-channel processing. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Within- and across-channel processes in modulation detection interference. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Michael Kubovy,et al.  Pitch Segregation by Interaural Phase, by Momentary Amplitude Disparity, and by Monaural Phase , 1983 .

[13]  W. Yost Auditory image perception and analysis: The basis for hearing , 1991, Hearing Research.

[14]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Across-channel Masking of Changes in Modulation Depth for Amplitude- and Frequency-modulated Signals , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  W A Yost,et al.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B C Moore,et al.  Modulation detection interference: some spectral effects. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W A Yost,et al.  The effect of distractor frequency on judgments of target laterality based on interaural delays. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  W A Yost,et al.  A comparison among three measures of cross-spectral processing of amplitude modulation with tonal signals. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  E. M. Cramer,et al.  Creation of Pitch through Binaural Interaction , 1958 .

[20]  William A. Yost Lateral position of sinusoids presented with interaural intensive and temporal differences , 1981 .

[21]  William A. Yost,et al.  Modulation Detection Interference: Across-frequency processing and auditory grouping , 1994, Hearing Research.

[22]  W A Yost Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  R. Dye,et al.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: lateralization on the basis of interaural delay. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Effects of combining maskers in modulation detection interference. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B C Moore,et al.  Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.