Effects of ultraviolet exposure and near infrared laser tweezers on human spermatozoa.

Photostress has to be considered during optical micromanipulation of gametes. Ultraviolet light, including low-energy UVA (32-400 nm) radiation, as well as high-intensity near infrared (NIR) laser radiation may induce cell damage. A total number of 580 light-exposed sperm cells were studied in single-cell photostress experiments. Low-power (1.5 mW, 5.3 W/cm2) UVA exposure with 365 nm radiation of a standard mercury microscopy lamp to human spermatozoa resulted within 109 +/- 30 s in paralysis and within 310 +/- 110 s in cell death. Cytotoxic effects during cell manipulation with laser microbeams were found to be partly based on non-linear excitation phenomena, in particular two-photon absorption by endogenous cell chromophores. Two-photon absorption will be more intense in the case of pulsed laser microradiation, but occur also during micromanipulation with highly focused continuous wave (cw) microbeams used as laser tweezers ('optical traps'). In particular, short-wavelength NIR traps < 800 nm induce UVA-like biological effects (oxidative stress). For example, sperm trapping with 760 nm microbeams resulted in UVA-like autofluorescence modifications, paralysis within 35 +/- 20 s and cell death within 65 +/- 20 s. In contrast, laser microbeams at 800-1064 nm may act as relatively safe micromanipulation tools. In most optical traps multifrequency cw lasers are employed. Radiation of these lasers can magnify cytotoxic effects. Therefore, single-frequency laser operation should be preferred. In general, laser assisted cell micromanipulation requires a new understanding of microbeam-cell interaction, including aspects of non-linear optics.

[1]  M W Berns,et al.  Determination of motility forces of human spermatozoa using an 800 nm optical trap. , 1996, Cellular and molecular biology.

[2]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[3]  Yona Tadir,et al.  Lasers in Micromanipulation of Preimplantation Embryos and Gametes , 1994 .

[4]  M W Berns,et al.  Cell damage by UVA radiation of a mercury microscopy lamp probed by autofluorescence modifications, cloning assay, and comet assay. , 1996, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  H. Schneckenburger,et al.  Fluorescence decay kinetics and imaging of NAD(P)H and flavins as metabolic indicators , 1992 .

[6]  J B Russell,et al.  Laser micromanipulation in the mouse embryo: a novel approach to zona drilling. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  M. Berns,et al.  Opening of the mouse zona pellucida by laser without a micromanipulator. , 1993, Human reproduction.

[8]  Tatiana B. Krasieva,et al.  Fluorescence imaging and spectroscopy of motile sperm cells and CHO cells in an optical trap (laser tweezers) , 1995, Photonics West.

[9]  Bruce J. Tromberg,et al.  AUTOFLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY OF OPTICALLY TRAPPED CELLS , 1995 .

[10]  B. Chance,et al.  Localization and kinetics of reduced pyridine nucleotide in living cells by microfluorometry. , 1959, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  K. König,et al.  Cell damage by near-IR microbeams , 1995, Nature.

[12]  D. Palanker,et al.  The efficacy and safety of zona pellucida drilling by a 193-nm excimer laser. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  R. Tyrrell,et al.  New trends in photobiology. The interaction of UVA radiation with cultured cells. , 1990, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[14]  A. Ashkin,et al.  Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria. , 1987, Science.

[15]  B. Carnes,et al.  INDUCTION OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT SINGLE‐STRAND BREAKS IN HUMAN CELL DNA BY FAR‐ AND NEAR‐ULTRAVIOLET RADIATIONS: ACTION SPECTRUM AND MECHANISMS , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[16]  S. Bassil,et al.  Micromanipulation of mouse gametes with laser microbeam and optical tweezers. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[17]  M W Berns,et al.  Micromanipulation of sperm by a laser generated optical trap. , 1989, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  K Rink,et al.  Microdissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48-microns diode laser beam: efficacy and safety of the procedure. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  Peter Fuhrberg,et al.  Photoablation of oocyte zona pellucida by erbium-yag laser for in-vitro fertilisation in severe male infertility , 1992, The Lancet.