The complexity of the Latin Square task and its influence on children’s performance

Prior studies analyzed the complexity of the Latin Square task solely based on the relational complexity theory, which, with the relational complexity defined by the complexity of relations processed in parallel, could not fully predict children’s performance on the task. So we developed an alternative method to analyze the task complexity by the relational complexity and the necessary processing steps to find a solution. The present study tested the validity of the new method applying to the Latin Square task and investigated how the task complexity influenced children’s performance on the task. 195 pupils from Grade 2–5 were recruited to perform computerized Latin Square task of 15 items. The results showed that: (i) The children’s performance on the Latin Square task fitted perfectly to the predictions by the Rasch measurement model. The relational complexity and the necessary processing steps both validly predicted the children’s reaction time for correct answers and the item difficulty levels assessed by the Rasch analysis. This validated our method for task complexity analysis. (ii) Generally, all the 2nd–5th graders performed well on the items whose relational complexity was binary or ternary. However, they had difficulties in solving the quaternary items, although there was improvement from grade 2 to grade 5.

[1]  Graeme S Halford,et al.  Theory of mind and relational complexity. , 2003, Child development.

[2]  U Müller,et al.  Developmental sequences in class reasoning and propositional reasoning. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity , 1998 .

[4]  G. Halford,et al.  A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Kathy E. Green,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods of Decomposing Item Difficulties , 1987 .

[6]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Mark Wilson,et al.  The shape of development , 2005 .

[8]  G. Halford,et al.  Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Mathematics Education: Models and Processes , 1995 .

[10]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  C. Fox,et al.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2001 .

[12]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task , 2002 .

[13]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Integration of Category Induction and Hierarchical Classification: One Paradigm at Two Levels of Complexity , 2002 .

[14]  K. Gilhooly The Nature of Reasoning: Working Memory and Reasoning , 2003 .

[15]  Graeme S Halford,et al.  : The development of deductive reasoning: How important is complexity? , 2004 .

[16]  Complexity effects are found in all relative-clause sentence forms , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Michael Lamport Commons,et al.  Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages , 1998 .

[18]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[19]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Measuring the Influence of Complexity on Relational Reasoning , 2006 .

[20]  H. Wellman,et al.  Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. , 2004, Child development.

[21]  Ziqiang Xin Fourth- Through Sixth-Grade Students' Representations of Area-of-Rectangle Problems: Influences of Relational Complexity and Cognitive Holding Power , 2008, The Journal of psychology.