Convergence in light transmission properties of transparent wing areas in clearwing mimetic butterflies

Müllerian mimicry is a positive interspecific interaction, whereby co-occurring defended prey species share a common aposematic signal that advertises their defences to predators. In Lepidoptera, aposematic species typically harbour conspicuous opaque wing colour pattern, which have convergent optical properties, as perceived by predators. Surprisingly, some aposematic mimetic species have partially or totally transparent wings, which raises the question of whether optical properties of such transparent areas are also under selection for convergence. To answer this question and to investigate how transparency is achieved in the first place, we conducted a comparative study of optics and structures of transparent wings in neotropical mimetic clearwing Lepidoptera. We quantified transparency by spectrophotometry and characterised clearwing microstructures and nanostructures by microscopy imaging. We show that transparency is convergent among co-mimics in the eyes of predators, despite a large diversity of underlying micro- and nanostructures. Notably, we reveal that nanostructure density largely influences light transmission. While transparency is primarily produced by modification of microstructure features, nanostructures may provide a way to fine-tune the degree of transparency. This study calls for a change of paradigm in transparent mimetic lepidoptera: transparency not only enables camouflage but can also be part of aposematic signals. Significance Transparency in animals has long been associated to camouflage, but the existence of aposematic mimetic Lepidoptera with partly transparent wings raises the question of the role of transparency in aposematism. Here, we undertake the first comparative analysis of transparency features in mimetic Lepidoptera. We show that transparency is likely part of the aposematic signal, as light transmission properties are convergent among co-mimics. We also reveal a high diversity of wing structures (scales and wing membrane nanostructures) underlying transparency, which enables fine-tuning the degree of transparency. This study, at the interface between physical optics and evolutionary biology, sheds light on the evolution of transparency in aposematic mimetic lineages and may promote bioinspired applications for transparent materials such as antireflective devices.

[1]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Brett R. Scheffers,et al.  Divergent melanism strategies in Andean butterfly communities structure diversity patterns and climate responses , 2018, Journal of Biogeography.

[3]  Akihiro Yoshida,et al.  Nanoprotuberance Array in the Transparent Wing of a Hawkmoth, Cephonodes hylas , 1996 .

[4]  G. Beccaloni Ecology, natural history and behaviour of Ithomiine butterflies and their mimics in Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). , 1997 .

[5]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Frequency‐dependent selection on aposematic prey: some experiments , 1989 .

[6]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Hugo Gruson,et al.  pavo 2.0: new tools for the spectral and spatial analysis of colour in R , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Camouflage , 1918, The Hospital.

[9]  Serge Berthier,et al.  Thermoregulation and spectral selectivity of the tropical butterfly Prepona meander: a remarkable example of temperature auto-regulation , 2005 .

[10]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .

[11]  M. Elias,et al.  Why has transparency evolved in aposematic butterflies? Insights from the largest radiation of aposematic butterflies, the Ithomiini , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[12]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[13]  B. Seymoure,et al.  A bird's eye view of two mimetic tropical butterflies: coloration matches predator's sensitivity , 2016 .

[14]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  Geiger V2.0: an Expanded Suite of Methods for Fitting Macroevolutionary Models to Phylogenetic Trees , 2014, Bioinform..

[15]  A. Lakhtakia,et al.  Coloration and Structure of the Wings of Chorinea sylphina Bates , 2017, The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society.

[16]  M. Stevens,et al.  The anti-predator function of ‘eyespots’ on camouflaged and conspicuous prey , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Guillaume Gomard,et al.  The role of random nanostructures for the omnidirectional anti-reflection properties of the glasswing butterfly , 2015, Nature Communications.

[18]  R. I. Hill,et al.  Mutualistic Mimicry and Filtering by Altitude Shape the Structure of Andean Butterfly Communities , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[19]  M. Elias,et al.  Transparency improves concealment in cryptically coloured moths , 2019, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[20]  J. Mallet,et al.  Correlations between adult mimicry and larval host plants in ithomiine butterflies , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Masquerade: Camouflage Without Crypsis , 2010, Science.

[22]  Naoe Hosoda,et al.  Waterproof and translucent wings at the same time: problems and solutions in butterflies , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[23]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .

[24]  Darrell J Kemp,et al.  Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Anton Sergeev,et al.  Diverse set of Turing nanopatterns coat corneae across insect lineages , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  N. Patel,et al.  Transparency in butterflies and moths: structural diversity, optical properties and ecological relevance , 2020, bioRxiv.

[27]  Jessica D. Schiffman,et al.  The natural transparency and piezoelectric response of the Greta oto butterfly wing. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[28]  The colouration toolkit of the Pipevine Swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor: thin films, papiliochromes, and melanin , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[30]  K. Kunte,et al.  Prey from the eyes of predators: Color discriminability of aposematic and mimetic butterflies from an avian visual perspective , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  M. Elias,et al.  Maintaining mimicry diversity: optimal warning colour patterns differ among microhabitats in Amazonian clearwing butterflies , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Measuring phylogenetic signal between categorical traits and phylogenies , 2018, Bioinform..

[33]  Akihiro Yoshida,et al.  Antireflective Nanoprotuberance Array in the Transparent Wing of a Hawkmoth, Cephonodes hylas , 1997 .

[34]  S. Merilaita,et al.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. Endler Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis , 1984 .

[36]  Thomas Bochynek,et al.  Infrastructure construction without information exchange: the trail clearing mechanism in Atta leafcutter ants , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[37]  L. Chittka,et al.  The evolution of color vision in insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[38]  M. Stoddard Mimicry and masquerade from the avian visual perspective , 2012 .

[39]  Emmanuel F. A. Toussaint,et al.  Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  N. Hart The Visual Ecology of Avian Photoreceptors , 2001, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[41]  M. Brändle,et al.  The dark side of Lepidoptera: Colour lightness of geometrid moths decreases with increasing latitude , 2018 .

[42]  J. Mappes,et al.  Transparency reduces predator detection in mimetic clearwing butterflies , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[43]  M. Stevens,et al.  The appearance of mimetic Heliconius butterflies to predators and conspecifics , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Selectivity in Mammalian Extinction Risk and Threat Types: a New Measure of Phylogenetic Signal Strength in Binary Traits , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[45]  M. Théry,et al.  Cryptic differences in colour among Müllerian mimics: how can the visual capacities of predators and prey shape the evolution of wing colours? , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[46]  A. Hunt,et al.  Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Doekele G Stavenga,et al.  Butterfly wing colors: glass scales of Graphium sarpedon cause polarized iridescence and enhance blue/green pigment coloration of the wing membrane , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.