Challenging enterprises and subcultures: interrogating 'best practice' in Central Queensland University's course management systems

[Abstract]: The notion of ‘best practice’ when applied to university teaching and learning confronts a difficult challenge: to raise the minimum educational standard in society without diluting the diversity constituting any university. This challenge is particularly evident at Central Queensland University (CQU), whose diversity of student demographics and characteristics, teaching modes and organisational structures exerts pressure on its perceived institutional unity and identity. This challenge of ‘best practice’ is exacerbated when applied to the examination of course management systems, which are commercial software packages that provide Web-based tools, services and resources to support the teaching and learning process for both online and blended delivery. The implementation of these systems at CQU has highlighted fault lines in the worldviews and priorities of different groups and individuals in the institution. It is the intersection of these enterprise systems – or “packages of computer applications that support many, even most, aspects of a company’s information needs” (McConachie, 2001, p. 194) – and subcultures and the impact of that intersection on understanding ‘best practice’ in CQU’s teaching and learning activities with which this paper is concerned. This intersection between enterprise systems and subcultures is illustrated by an analysis of the results of an online survey questionnaire completed between August and October 2003 by 91 respondents, representing academic and general staff members, managers and students from eight campuses and seven faculties/divisions. The authors argue that the survey results contain significant lessons for conceptualising ‘best practice’ in CQU’s teaching and learning, including the urgent need for strategies to make visible the aforementioned fault lines between enterprise systems and subcultures.

[1]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Organizational Subcultures in a Soft Bureaucracy: Resistance Behind the Myth and Facade of an Official Culture , 1991 .

[2]  Olaf G. Rughase.  What is Organizational Identity , 2006 .

[3]  E. Schein.  Organisational culture and leadership , 1991 .

[4]  S. Barley,et al.  Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations , 1982 .

[5]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[6]  G. Hughes.  In search of excellence , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  Patrick Alan Danaher,et al.  Course management systems: innovation versus managerialism , 2004 .

[8]  Joanne D. Martin.  Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives , 1992 .

[9]  Ania Lian,et al.  Knowledge transfer and technology in education: toward a complete learning environment , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  E-Learning as an Emerging Entrepreneurial Enterprise in Universities and Firms , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  EDUCAUSE CENTER FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 73 Faculty Use of Course Management Systems , 2003 .

[12]  S. Sackmann.  Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge , 1992 .

[13]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[14]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[15]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Digital academe : the new media and institutions of higher education and learning , 2005 .

[16]  E. Schein.  Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning , 1996 .