Sequence-specific implicit motor learning using whole-arm three-dimensional reach movements

Implicit motor learning is essential to the acquisition of motor skills. Examination of implicit motor learning, however, has largely involved single-finger button presses or two-dimensional movements of a computer mouse or joystick. The purpose of this study was to examine sequence-specific implicit motor learning during practice of  a three-dimensional (3D) whole-arm reach task. Fifteen young, non-disabled individuals completed two consecutive days of practice of a 3D target task presented in a virtual environment with the dominant, right arm. Stimuli were displayed one at a time and alternated between an eight-target random sequence and an eight-target repeated sequence. Movement of the shoulder and elbow was required to successfully capture a target. Performance was indicated by time to complete a sequence (response time) and analyzed by sequence type (random, repeated). Kinematic data (total distance to complete a sequence, peak velocity, and time to peak velocity) were used to determine how movement changed over time. Results showed significant improvements in performance early in practice, regardless of sequence type. However, individuals completed the repeated sequence faster than the random sequence, indicating sequence-specific implicit motor learning. The difference in response time between the sequence types was driven by the total distance of the hand path; the distance traveled for the repeated sequence was shorter than the distance of the random sequence. Examination of implicit motor learning using 3D reach movements provides the opportunity to study learning using whole-arm movements, an important component of many real-world, functional tasks.

[1]  R. D Seidler,et al.  Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  Justin T. Maxwell,et al.  From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  C. Winstein,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Cerebellar Stroke Impairs Temporal but Not Spatial Accuracy during Implicit Motor Learning Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[10]  C. A. Dairaghi,et al.  Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Jill Campbell Stewart,et al.  Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  L. Boyd,et al.  Continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional sensory and motor cortex enhances motor learning post-stroke , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Winstein,et al.  Infusing Motor Learning Research Into Neurorehabilitation Practice: A Historical Perspective With Case Exemplar From the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program , 2014, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[15]  L. Boyd,et al.  Role of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor learning: An rTMS study , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[16]  L. Boyd,et al.  5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional sensory cortex enhances motor learning after stroke , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Y. Stern,et al.  Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  J. Krakauer.  Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[19]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Virtual reality environments to enhance upper limb functional recovery in patients with hemiparesis. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[20]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  L. Boyd,et al.  Impact of 5‐Hz rTMS over the primary sensory cortex is related to white matter volume in individuals with chronic stroke , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[23]  L. Boyd,et al.  A single bout of high-intensity aerobic exercise facilitates response to paired associative stimulation and promotes sequence-specific implicit motor learning. , 2014, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[25]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Implicit motor-sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: the impact of practice and explicit knowledge , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[28]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The 1996 Tucson Discussions and Debates , 1998 .

[30]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  L. Boyd,et al.  Motor sequence learning occurs despite disrupted visual and proprioceptive feedback , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[33]  C. Winstein,et al.  Explicit Information Interferes with Implicit Motor Learning of Both Continuous and Discrete Movement Tasks After Stroke , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[34]  J. Messier,et al.  Preserved Spatial Memory for Reaching to Remembered Three-Dimensional Targets in Aging , 2012, Experimental aging research.

[35]  J. Messier,et al.  Impact of Parkinson’s disease and dopaminergic medication on adaptation to explicit and implicit visuomotor perturbations , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  L. Boyd,et al.  Correlations between brain activity and components of motor learning in middle-aged adults: an fMRI study , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  R. Donders,et al.  Cognitive decline following stroke: a comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[38]  E. Vakil,et al.  Motor and non-motor sequence learning in patients with basal ganglia lesions: the case of serial reaction time (SRT) , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  K. Doya.  Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  G. Tononi,et al.  The serial reaction time task revisited: a study on motor sequence learning with an arm-reaching task , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  L. Boyd,et al.  High-Intensity Aerobic Exercise Enhances Motor Memory Retrieval. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[43]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[44]  Marc Roig,et al.  A Single Bout of Exercise Improves Motor Memory , 2012, PloS one.

[45]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Justin T. Maxwell,et al.  The implicit benefit of learning without errors , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[47]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Learning of a sequential motor skill comprises explicit and implicit components that consolidate differently. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  L. Boyd,et al.  Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to left dorsal premotor cortex enhances motor consolidation of new skills , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Masters,et al.  Motor learning of a dynamic balancing task after stroke: implicit implications for stroke rehabilitation. , 2006, Physical therapy.