Cycles and matchings in randomly perturbed digraphs and hypergraphs

Abstract We consider several situations where “typical” structures have certain spanning substructures (in particular, Hamilton cycles), but where worst-case extremal examples do not. In these situations we show that the extremal examples are “fragile” in that after a modest random perturbation our desired substructures will typically appear. This builds on a sizeable existing body of research. Our first theorem is that adding linearly many random edges to a dense k-uniform hypergraph typically ensures the existence of a perfect matching or a loose Hamilton cycle. We outline the proof of this theorem, which involves a nonstandard application of Szemeredi's regularity lemma to “beat the union bound”; this might be of independent interest. Our next theorem is that digraphs with certain strong expansion properties are pancyclic. This implies that adding a linear number of random edges typically makes a dense digraph pancyclic. Our final theorem is that perturbing a certain (minimum-degree-dependent) number of random edges in a tournament typically ensures the existence of multiple edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. All our results are tight.

[1]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[2]  Shang-Hua Teng,et al.  Smoothed Analysis (Motivation and Discrete Models) , 2003, WADS.

[3]  Andrzej Rucinski,et al.  On the evolution of a random tournament , 1996, Discret. Math..

[4]  G. Dirac Some Theorems on Abstract Graphs , 1952 .

[5]  Deryk Osthus,et al.  Proof of a conjecture of Thomassen on Hamilton cycles in highly connected tournaments , 2014 .

[6]  Andrzej Dudek,et al.  Tight Hamilton cycles in random uniform hypergraphs , 2011, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[7]  Terence Tao Szemerédi's regularity lemma revisited , 2006, Contributions Discret. Math..

[8]  Daniela Kühn,et al.  Loose Hamilton cycles in hypergraphs , 2008, Discret. Math..

[9]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  Dirac-Type Questions For Hypergraphs — A Survey (Or More Problems For Endre To Solve) , 2010 .

[10]  J. Moon Topics on tournaments , 1968 .

[11]  L. Moser,et al.  Almost all Tournaments are Irreducible , 1962, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin.

[12]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  On packing Hamilton cycles in ?-regular graphs , 2005, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[13]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  An approximate Dirac-type theorem for k-uniform hypergraphs , 2008, Comb..

[14]  Alexey Pokrovskiy,et al.  Edge disjoint Hamiltonian cycles in highly connected tournaments , 2014, 1406.7556.

[15]  B. Sudakov,et al.  On smoothed analysis in dense graphs and formulas , 2006 .

[16]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[17]  D. Spielman,et al.  Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time , 2004 .

[18]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Adding random edges to dense graphs , 2004, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[19]  J. Kahn,et al.  Factors in random graphs , 2008 .

[20]  M. Simonovits,et al.  Szemeredi''s Regularity Lemma and its applications in graph theory , 1995 .

[21]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Reducibility among combinatorial problems" in complexity of computer computations , 1972 .

[22]  Tom Bohman,et al.  How many random edges make a dense graph hamiltonian? , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[23]  L. Pósa,et al.  Hamiltonian circuits in random graphs , 1976, Discret. Math..