Stent Coating With Titanium-Nitride-Oxide for Reduction of Neointimal Hyperplasia

Background—Coronary stents prevent constrictive arterial remodeling but stimulate neointimal hyperplasia. Stainless steel induces a metallic foreign body reaction, which is absent for titanium. The hypothesis of the present study was that titanium renders the stent surface biologically inert, with reduced platelet and fibrinogen binding. Methods and Results—Twelve pigs were instrumented with a stainless steel and 2 titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents (TiNOX 1, ceramic; TiNOX 2, metallic). Animals were restudied after 6 weeks. Histological specimens of stented segments were analyzed by digital morphometry. Platelet adhesion and fibrinogen binding studies were performed in the perfusion chamber. Under in vitro conditions, TiNOX 1 showed reduced platelet adhesion (65±3%) compared with TiNOX 2 (72±5%;P <0.05) and stainless steel (71±4%;P <0.05). Platelet adhesion 48 hours after incubation with human plasma, however, was not different between TiNOX 1 (17±3%) and 2 (15±3%) but was significantly higher with stainless steel (23±2%;P <0.05). Fibrinogen binding was significantly reduced with TiNOX 2 (54±3%) compared with TiNOX 1 (82±4%, P <0.05) or stainless steel (100%, P <0.05). Histomorphometry revealed a significantly larger neointimal area in stainless steel (2.61±1.12 mm2) than in TiNOX 1–coated (1.47±0.84 mm2, P <0.02) or TiNOX 2–coated (1.39±0.93 mm2, P <0.02) stents. The reductions were 44% and 47%, respectively. Conclusions—TiNOX coating significantly reduces neointimal hyperplasia in stainless steel stents. The antiproliferative effect was similar for both TiNOX coatings, suggesting that the electrochemical properties are more important for attenuation of neointimal proliferation than the observed differences in platelet adhesion and fibrinogen binding.

[1]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Kinetics of fibrinogen and platelet adherence to biomaterials. , 1976, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[2]  L. Vroman Methods of Investigating Protein Interactions on Artificial and Natural Surfaces , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Black,et al.  Biological and biomechanical performance of biomaterials: Editors: P. Christel, A. Meunier and A.J.C. Lee Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1986, pp 550, $124 , 1987 .

[4]  George A. Ksander,et al.  Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials , 1988 .

[5]  Larry S. Dean,et al.  Intracoronary Stenting for Acute and Threatened Closure Complicating Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1992, Circulation.

[6]  K. Robinson,et al.  Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Leon,et al.  Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  M. Leon,et al.  Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  J. Sixma,et al.  Platelet adhesion to collagen type IV under flow conditions. , 1996, Blood.

[13]  P D Verdouw,et al.  Reduction in thrombotic events with heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in normal porcine coronary arteries. , 1996, Circulation.

[14]  E. Edelman,et al.  Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. , 1996, Circulation.

[15]  S. Steinemann Metal implants and surface reactions. , 1996, Injury.

[16]  E. Topol,et al.  Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. , 1996, Circulation.

[17]  E. Edelman,et al.  Rat arterial wall retains myointimal hyperplastic potential long after arterial injury. , 1997, Circulation.

[18]  Heublein,et al.  Silicon Carbide Coating Ñ A Semiconducting Hybrid Design of Coronary Stents Ñ A Feasibility Study. , 1998, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[19]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Serial intravascular ultrasound evaluation of remodeling in transplant CAD: influence of disease progression , 1998 .

[20]  S. Steinemann Titanium--the material of choice? , 1998, Periodontology 2000.

[21]  M. Leon,et al.  In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II) , 1998, The Lancet.

[23]  A. Becker,et al.  Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. , 1998, Circulation.

[24]  V. Fuster,et al.  Prolonged thrombin inhibition reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries. , 1998, Circulation.

[25]  F. Prati,et al.  In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the stent: an intravascular ultrasound study. , 1999, Circulation.

[26]  G. Stone,et al.  Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. , 1999, Circulation.

[27]  E. Edelman,et al.  Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. , 1999, Circulation research.

[28]  P. D. de Feyter,et al.  Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coro , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  A Machraoui,et al.  Acute and chronic tissue response to coronary stent implantation: pathologic findings in human specimen. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  W. J. van der Giessen,et al.  Biocompatibility of phosphorylcholine coated stents in normal porcine coronary arteries , 2000, Heart.

[31]  A. Schömig,et al.  Inhibition of neointima formation after experimental coronary artery stenting: a new biodegradable stent coating releasing hirudin and the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. , 2000, Circulation.

[32]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2000, Circulation.