The effect of built space on wayfinding in urban environments: a study of the historical peninsula in İstanbul

This paper reconsiders the question of how the built environment, in terms of the spatial configuration of urban layout and land‐use patterns, affects wayfinding performance. In an attempt to develop physical design solutions, first‐time visitors’ directed search patterns within a 2x2km area in the historical peninsula of Sultanahmet, Istanbul, are recorded. The recorded data are analyzed to determine the extent to which street connectivity, measured by metric and directional reach, and visibility patterns, measured by visual integration, visual connectivity and visual clustering coefficient, are related to spatial learning –path selection for exploratory movement. This study enhances previous findings using space syntax by better controlling for the effects of land‐use as compared to the effects of spatial configuration of urban networks. Asserting the independent role of configurational design is important given that urban morphology acts as the long term framework within which land‐uses change over time. The findings imply that the overall spatial configuration of urban layouts –both at the local and global level– may prove to be an important variable for the description and modulation of human spatial behavior in urban environments.

[1]  Ruth Alison Conroy-Dalton,et al.  Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments , 2001 .

[2]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Orientation and the Angularity of Urban Routes , 1991 .

[3]  Nhs Estates,et al.  Design against crime : a strategic approach to hospital planning , 1994 .

[4]  R. Dalton The Secret Is To Follow Your Nose , 2001 .

[5]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[6]  Jerry Weisman,et al.  Evaluating Architectural Legibility , 1981 .

[7]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Road Climbing: Principles Governing Asymmetric Route Choices on Maps , 1998 .

[8]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks – analyzing the least-angle strategy , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[9]  C. Zimring,et al.  Just Down The Road A Piece , 2003 .

[10]  A. Turner,et al.  Depthmap 4: a researcher's handbook , 2004 .

[11]  N. Christenfeld Choices from Identical Options , 1995 .

[12]  H. Couclelis VERBAL DIRECTIONS FOR WAY-FINDING: SPACE, COGNITION, AND LANGUAGE , 1996 .

[13]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[14]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[15]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Mental Maze Solving , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Remembering Changes in Direction , 1989 .

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments , 1999, COSIT.

[21]  P. Pizor Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. , 1987 .

[22]  Mahbub Rashid,et al.  On the Description of Shape and Spatial Configuration inside Buildings: Convex Partitions and Their Local Properties , 1997 .

[23]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Evaluation of a Conceptual Model of Architectural Legibility , 1991 .

[24]  Michael Batty,et al.  The virtual Tate , 1999 .

[25]  G W Evans,et al.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[26]  F. Peatross The Spatial dimensions of control in restricted settings , 1944 .

[27]  E. L. Amidon,et al.  Delineating landscape view areas...a computer approach , 1968 .

[28]  John Peponis,et al.  The Connectivity of Streets: Reach and Directional Distance , 2008 .

[29]  Shannon Dawn Moeser Cognitive Mapping in a Complex Building , 1988 .

[30]  E. Sadalla,et al.  The Perception of Traversed Distance , 1980 .

[31]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Place recognition and wayfinding: Making sense of space , 1992 .

[32]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[33]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Perceiving Architectural Space: From Optic Arrays to lsovists , 2013 .

[34]  D. Appleyard Styles and Methods of Structuring a City , 1970 .

[35]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[36]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Analytical Behavioural Geography , 1987 .

[37]  Alasdair Turner,et al.  Making isovists syntactic: isovist integration analysis , 1999 .

[38]  K. Lynch,et al.  Managing the sense of a region , 1976 .

[39]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[40]  William J. Cook,et al.  Human Orientation in Transportation Terminals , 1980 .