Urine testing as a surveillance tool to monitor the impact of HPV immunization programs

HPV surveillance is necessary to monitor the impact and success of HPV immunization programs. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of HPV testing in urine to assess its suitability for epidemiological and surveillance purposes. A total of 90 females and 117 males were recruited from a UK drop‐in clinic offering integrated sexual health services. A urine sample and comparator gold‐standard sample (cervical liquid‐based cytology sample or penile swab) was collected from each subject. HPV detection was performed using a PCR‐based assay. Discrepancy between the two overall distributions [urine vs. gold standard (GS)] was measured. At the individual level, sensitivity and specificity of HPV detection in urine versus GS was measured. Prevalence of HPV was higher in urine compared to GS in both females and males. At the individual level, sensitivity of urine versus GS for HPV detection was 90.5% (79.3–96.9) and 55.9% (37.8–72.8) in females and males, respectively. The overall distribution of HPV types in urine was similar to that in gold standard, (P = 0.78; male, P = 0.88; female). Type‐specific matches in urine versus GS were achieved in 71% (61–79.5) and 63.2% (54.2–71.4) of samples from females and males, respectively. Urine, particularly from females, is a useful biospecimen for HPV surveillance purposes. Further examination into the usefulness of urine from males, including choice of relevant gold‐standard comparator, is required. J. Med. Virol. 83:1983–1987, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Sodhani,et al.  Urine HPV-DNA detection for cervical cancer screening: Prospects and prejudices , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[2]  A. Maniatis,et al.  Use of real-time PCR to detect human papillomavirus-16 viral loads in vaginal and urine self-sampled specimens. , 2008, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  J. Westerga,et al.  The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in paired urine and cervical smear samples of HIV-infected women. , 2008, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[4]  P. Castle,et al.  A Comparison of Cervical and Vaginal Human Papillomavirus , 2007, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  A. Giuliano,et al.  The optimal anatomic sites for sampling heterosexual men for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection: the HPV detection in men study. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  C. Meijer,et al.  HPV Detection Methods , 2007, Disease markers.

[7]  F. Lunel,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Quantification in Urine and Cervical Samples by Using the Mx4000 and LightCycler General Real-Time PCR Systems , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  P. Snijders,et al.  Flat penile lesions: The infectious “invisible” link in the transmission of human papillomavirus , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[9]  K. Holmes,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Sexually Active Young Women in the United States: Implications for Developing a Vaccination Strategy , 2006, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  K. Shah,et al.  Concordance of human papillomavirus in the cervix and urine among inner city adolescents , 2000, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.