Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors.

The error-related negativity (ERN) represents a neural response, recorded from scalp electrodes, that is associated with monitoring activities. It is most likely generated in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Measures of the ERN, and of behavioral and perceived accuracy, were obtained from participants while they performed a visual 2-choice reaction time task under degraded stimulus conditions. Irrespective of behavioral accuracy, the amplitude of the ERN (measured at the time of the response) covaried with the perceived inaccuracy of the behavior (measured at the end of the trial). Errors due to premature responding (errors perceived as errors) were associated with large ERNs. Errors due to data limitations (errors about which there was uncertainty) were associated with smaller ERNs. These and other results are consistent with the proposal that performance monitoring, as manifested by the ERN, involves a comparison between representations of the appropriate response and the response actually made.

[1]  Ellen Perecman,et al.  Integrating Theory and Practice in Clinical Neuropsychology , 2018 .

[2]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[3]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Coles,et al.  "Where did I go wrong?" A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[7]  Ritske de Jong,et al.  THE ROLE OF PREPARATION IN OVERLAPPING-TASK PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[8]  G. Karmos,et al.  Perspectives of Event-Related Potentials Research , 1995 .

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[10]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[11]  T R Bashore,et al.  Optimal digital filters for long-latency components of the event-related brain potential. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[13]  Kunkel Jm,et al.  Spontaneous subclavain vein thrombosis: a successful combined approach of local thrombolytic therapy followed by first rib resection. , 1989 .

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Frontal Lobes , 1986 .

[16]  G. Logan Executive control of thought and action , 1985 .

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[18]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[21]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[23]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Detection of Errors by Skilled Typists , 1978 .

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[26]  A. Luria The Working Brain: An Introduction To Neuropsychology , 1976 .

[27]  William G. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1977 .

[28]  M. J. Billington,et al.  The Deadline model for simple reaction times , 1972 .

[29]  Joseph R. Higgins,et al.  Correction of false moves in pursuit tracking , 1969 .

[30]  P. Venables,et al.  A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods , 1967 .

[31]  P. Rabbitt Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Michael G. H. Coles,et al.  Berger's dream? The error-related negativity and modern cognitive psychophysiology. , 1998 .

[33]  E. Donchin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[34]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[35]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Supervisory control of action and thought selection. , 1993 .

[36]  C. Brunia,et al.  Psychophysiological brain research. , 1993 .

[37]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[38]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Functional differences between members of the P300 complex: P3e and P3b. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[40]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[41]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[42]  Allen Newell,et al.  Production Systems: Models of Control Structures , 1973 .

[43]  P. Rabbitt Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice-response time. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[44]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.