Implementation intentions during multimedia learning: Using if-then plans to facilitate cognitive processing

Abstract To successfully learn from multimedia, learners must actively process text and pictures and integrate their information. Two experiments investigated how to support these cognitive processes by means of implementation intentions. Implementation intentions are “if-then” plans that are assumed to strongly link an opportunity to act (e.g., ‘IF I have finished reading a paragraph’) with an action that helps to attain a learning goal (e.g., ‘THEN I will search for corresponding information in the picture’), so that the action is automatically carried out once the opportunity is encountered. In Experiment 1 ( N  = 160), the number of implementation intentions (1 vs. 3) as well as the type of cognitive process supported by them (text processing, picture processing, text-picture integration, or a combination thereof) were varied. Additionally, a control group learned without implementation intentions. In line with our hypotheses, implementation intentions improved multimedia learning outcomes, especially if they supported a combination of all types of cognitive processes. In Experiment 2 ( N  = 42), this positive effect of the combined implementation intention condition was shown to prevail against a more conservative control group. These findings together indicate that implementation intentions represent an effective means to support learners in effectively processing multimedia instruction.

[1]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation , 2006 .

[2]  Anja Achtziger,et al.  Implementation Intentions and Shielding Goal Striving From Unwanted Thoughts and Feelings , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  Supporting learning from illustrated texts: conceptualizing and evaluating a learning strategy , 2011 .

[4]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[5]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Implementation intentions do not enhance all types of goals: The moderating role of goal difficulty , 2003 .

[6]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Individual Differences in Reading To Summarize Expository Text: Evidence from Eye Fixation Patterns. , 2002 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  Children's Compensations for Poorly Automated Reading Skills , 2004 .

[9]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes , 2006 .

[11]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Florian Schmidt-Weigand,et al.  A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning , 2010 .

[13]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[14]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  How Inspecting a Picture Affects Processing of Text in Multimedia Learning , 2013 .

[15]  I. Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Behavior: Implementation Intention, Commitment, and Conscientiousness , 2009 .

[16]  P. Sheeran.  Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2002 .

[17]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Using eye tracking in applied research to study and stimulate the processing of information from multi-representational sources , 2009 .

[18]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[19]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Teaching of Learning Strategies. , 1983 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[21]  D. Leutner,et al.  Is it Merely a Question of “What” to Prompt or Also “When” to Prompt? , 2009 .

[22]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  F. Paas,et al.  Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design , 2009 .

[24]  Dominique Sluijsmans,et al.  Toward a Synthesis of Cognitive Load Theory, Four-Component Instructional Design, and Self-Directed Learning , 2009 .

[25]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  If-Then Planning Helps School-Aged Children to Ignore Attractive Distractions , 2011 .

[26]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of Headings on Text Processing Strategies. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[27]  Johannes Brug,et al.  More or better: Do the number and specificity of implementation intentions matter in increasing physical activity? , 2011 .

[28]  Claudia Winter,et al.  Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Marcus Nyström,et al.  How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding , 2013 .

[30]  Patrik Pluchino,et al.  Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations , 2010 .

[32]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning , 2010 .

[33]  John Leach,et al.  Chromosomes: the missing link — young people's understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation , 2000 .

[34]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[35]  R. Koestner,et al.  Attaining personal goals: self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Action control by implementation intentions : effective cue detection and efficient response initiation , 2007 .

[37]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view , 2003 .

[38]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[40]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The Effects of Signals on Learning from Text and Diagrams: How Looking at Diagrams Earlier and More Frequently Improves Understanding , 2010, Diagrams.

[41]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Effective self-regulation of goal attainment , 2000 .

[43]  M. Hegarty.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis. , 1997 .

[45]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  The Multimedia Principle. , 2005 .

[46]  Florian Schmidt-Weigand,et al.  Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: New insights from investigating students' viewing behaviour , 2010 .

[47]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[48]  P. Spargo,et al.  Construction of a paper-and-pencil Test of Basic Scientific Literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1996 .

[49]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[50]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Utilization of Illustrations during Learning of Science Textbook Passages among Low- and High-Ability Children. , 1999, Contemporary educational psychology.

[51]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  Extending multimedia research: How do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Paul T. Sindelar,et al.  The Effects of Repeated Readings and Attentional Cues on Reading Fluency and Comprehension , 1985 .

[53]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2006 .

[54]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[55]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Boosting scholastic test scores by willpower: The role of implementation intentions , 2007 .

[56]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit , 1997 .

[57]  Tina Seufert.  Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[58]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Coherence Formation when Learning from Text and Pictures: What Kind of Support for Whom? , 2009 .