Factors influencing workplace health promotion intervention: a qualitative systematic review

Although workplace health promotion (WHP) has evolved over the last 40 years, systematically collected knowledge on factors influencing the functioning of WHP is scarce. Therefore, a qualitative systematic literature review was carried out to systematically identify and synthesize factors influencing the phases of WHP interventions: needs assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation. Research evidence was identified by searching electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Social Sciences Citation Index, ASSIA, ERIC, IBBS and PsycINFO) from 1998 to 2013, as well as by cross-checking reference lists of included peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria were: original empirical research, description of WHP, description of barriers to and/or facilitators of the planning, implementation and/or evaluation of WHP. Finally, 54 full texts were included. From these, influencing factors were extracted and summarized using thematic analysis. The majority of influencing factors referred to the implementation phase, few dealt with planning and/or evaluation and none with needs assessment. The influencing factors were condensed into topics with respect to factors at contextual level (e.g. economic crisis); factors at organizational level (e.g. management support); factors at intervention level (e.g. quality of intervention concept); factors at implementer level (e.g. resources); factors at participant level (e.g. commitment to intervention) and factors referring to methodological and data aspects (e.g. data-collection issues). Factors regarding contextual issues and organizational aspects were identified across three phases. Therefore, future research and practice should consider not only the influencing factors at different levels, but also at different phases of WHP interventions.

[1]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  Barbara A. Israel,et al.  Process evaluation for public health interventions and research , 2002 .

[3]  Hude Quan,et al.  An administrative data merging solution for dealing with missing data in a clinical registry: adaptation from ICD-9 to ICD-10 , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[4]  T. Driscoll,et al.  The health–promoting workplace: an integrative perspective , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[5]  Adrian Sayers,et al.  Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review. , 2007, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  Willem Van Mechelen,et al.  What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[7]  Karen A. Blase,et al.  Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the , 2005 .

[8]  V. Simovska,et al.  Effects of student participation in school health promotion: a systematic review , 2017, Health promotion international.

[9]  William B. Cissell,et al.  Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research , 2004 .

[10]  M. Nitsch,et al.  Praxisprojekte betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung , 2014, Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.

[11]  D. Rojatz,et al.  Zentrale Einflussfaktoren der betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung , 2015, Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.

[12]  P. Nowak,et al.  Effects of Student Participation in Decision Making at School. A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research. , 2012 .

[13]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Process Evaluations of the 5-a-Day Projects , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[14]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[15]  J. Bortz,et al.  Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler , 2006 .

[16]  Karen A. Blase,et al.  Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (No. 231). University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Implementation Research Network. , 2012 .

[17]  Huey-tsyh Chen,et al.  The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new perspective for program evaluation. , 2010, Evaluation and program planning.

[18]  A. Sayers Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  T. Paulussen,et al.  Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[20]  J. Bortz,et al.  Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation , 1995 .

[21]  L. Newman,et al.  Health Promotion in Small Business: A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Adoption and Effectiveness of Worksite Wellness Programs , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[22]  Susan Woldenberg Butler Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review , 2007 .

[23]  Joechim Hohl,et al.  Das qualitative Interview , 2000, Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health.