A different approach to validating screening assays for developmental toxicity.

BACKGROUND There continue to be many efforts around the world to develop assays that are shorter than the traditional embryofetal developmental toxicity assay, or use fewer or no mammals, or use less compound, or have all three attributes. Each assay developer needs to test the putative assay against a set of performance standards, which traditionally has involved testing the assays against a list of compounds that are generally recognized as "positive" or "negative" in vivo. However, developmental toxicity is highly conditional, being particularly dependent on magnitude (i.e. dose) and timing of exposure, which makes it difficult to develop lists of compounds neatly assigned as developmental toxicants or not. APPROACH Here we offer an alternative approach for the evaluation of developmental toxicity assays based on exposures. Exposures are classified as "positive" or "negative" in a system, depending on the compound and the internal concentration. Although this linkage to "internal dose" departs from the recent approaches to validation, it fits well with widely accepted principles of developmental toxicology. CONCLUSIONS This paper introduces this concept, discusses some of the benefits and drawbacks of such an approach, and lays out the steps we propose to implement it for the evaluation of developmental toxicity assays.

[1]  Aldert Piersma,et al.  A Review of the Implementation of the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST) , 2009, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[2]  A. Piersma,et al.  Use of the rat postimplantation embryo culture to assess the embryotoxic potency within a chemical category and to identify toxic metabolites. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  Johannes J M van de Sandt,et al.  Prediction of in vivo embryotoxic effect levels with a combination of in vitro studies and PBPK modelling. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[4]  Aldert Piersma,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests: Results of the Definitive Phase and Evaluation of Prediction Models , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[5]  N. Brown Selection of Test Chemicals for the ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[6]  R. Brent,et al.  Teratogen update: evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. , 2001, Teratology.

[7]  P. Brown-Woodman,et al.  A review of the contribution of whole embryo culture to the determination of hazard and risk in teratogenicity testing. , 1997, The International journal of developmental biology.

[8]  H. Solomon,et al.  Spontaneous and induced alterations in the cardiac membranous ventricular septum of fetal, weanling, and adult rats. , 1997, Teratology.

[9]  M. Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluation of Chick Embryo Neural Retina Cell Culture as a Screen for Developmental Toxicants , 1995 .

[10]  M. Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluation of chick embryo neural retinal cell culture as a screen for developmental toxicants. , 1995, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  M. Harris,et al.  Developmental toxicology: status of the field and contribution of the National Toxicology Program. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  B. Schwetz Criteria for judging the relative toxicity of chemicals from developmental toxicity data: a workshop summary. , 1992, Teratology.

[13]  G. Daston,et al.  Interspecies Comparisons of A/D Ratios: A/D Ratios Are Not Constant across Species , 1991 .

[14]  M K Smith,et al.  A selection of candidate compounds for in vitro teratogenesis test validation. , 1983, Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.

[15]  A. Kast,et al.  Repairability of drug-induced "wavy ribs" in rat offspring. , 1982, Arzneimittel-Forschung.

[16]  M. George,et al.  The Hydra attenuata system for detection of teratogenic hazards. , 1982, Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.