An assessment of the construct validity of environmental strategy measures

The natural resource-based view of the company is emerging as a dominant paradigm for understanding the intersection of strategic management and the natural environment. Companies that proactively incorporate a natural environment perspective into their enterprise strategies are said to have sustainable competitive advantages. However, defining and measuring environmental strategy has been challenging, with different approaches yielding inconsistent results. Many studies ignore the empirical difficulties of marrying the theoretical connection between the company's resource base and environmental strategy, and its impact on environmental company performance. In this paper, we apply an inductive approach to derive a measure of environmental strategy theoretically congruent with the natural resource-based-view of the firm. We assess its reliability and, using a multi-trait multi-method matrix, confirm the convergent and discriminant validities of this measure against other measures often used by researchers. We also establish predictive validity of our environmental strategy measure for environmental performance. We discuss the implications of the measure for future research and practice.

[1]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[2]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[3]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[4]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[5]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[6]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF AN OBJECTIVE (ENTROPY) CATEGORICAL MEASURE OF DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY , 1993 .

[7]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[9]  Fiona Steele,et al.  The Analysis and Interpretation of Multivariate Data for Social Scientists , 2002 .

[10]  D. Siegel,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and economic performance , 2006 .

[11]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China , 1998 .

[12]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[13]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  VISIONARY LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1989 .

[14]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[15]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[16]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[17]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports , 1983 .

[18]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[19]  Mark Cordano,et al.  Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen'S Theory of Planned Behavior , 2000 .

[20]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[21]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure , 2006 .

[22]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[23]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[24]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[25]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Kevin S. Groves.  Leader emotional expressivity, visionary leadership, and organizational change , 2006 .

[27]  Jitendra V. Singh.  Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[28]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[29]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[30]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Managerial Resources and Rents , 1991 .

[31]  Nigel Roome,et al.  Developing environmental management strategies , 1992 .

[32]  E. Steen,et al.  Organizational Beliefs and Managerial Vision , 2005 .

[33]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Justification of Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[34]  James W. Cortada,et al.  Strategic Data Processing: Considerations for Management (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1984), book abstract , 1984, Int. CMG Conference.

[35]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[36]  Juan Alberto Aragón-Correa,et al.  Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment , 2004 .

[37]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism, and Coordination , 2006 .

[38]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[39]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[40]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[41]  M. Russo,et al.  Organizational Design and Environmental Performance: Clues From the Electronics Industry , 2005 .

[42]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages , 1978 .

[43]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[44]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[45]  Barbara Bigelow,et al.  Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals' Use of Impression Management , 2000 .

[46]  M. Toffel,et al.  Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .

[47]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  LEAN AND GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAN PRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[48]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[49]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[50]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[51]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[52]  Cheng-Chen Lin,et al.  Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries , 2006, Journal of International Business Studies.

[53]  Sanjay Sharma.  Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[54]  Lennart Karlson,et al.  Business incentives for sustainability: a property rights approach , 2002 .

[55]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[56]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[57]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[58]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[59]  J. O. N. Entine,et al.  The Myth of Social Investing , 2003 .

[60]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[61]  Michael W. Toffel,et al.  Improving Environmental Performance Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Weighting Methods Used to Evaluate Chemical Release Inventories , 2004 .

[62]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection , 1996 .

[63]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance , 1994 .

[64]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[65]  Alfred Marcus,et al.  The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation , 1998 .

[66]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  The importance of individuals' repertoires of behaviors: The scientific appropriateness of studying multiple behaviors and general attitudes. , 1998 .

[67]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[68]  J. Aragón-Correa.  Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment , 1998 .

[69]  Mark D. Hanna,et al.  An empirical exploration of the relationship between manufacturing strategy and environmental management: Two complementary models , 1996 .

[70]  J. E. Morhardt.  Scoring Corporate Environmental Reports for Comprehensiveness: A Comparison of Three Systems , 2001, Environmental management.

[71]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[72]  T E McKone,et al.  Human toxicity potentials for life‐cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[73]  K. Dechant,et al.  Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage , 1994 .

[74]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  Environmental technologies and competitive advantage , 1995 .

[75]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[76]  S. Parker.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[77]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[78]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Individual Environmental Initiative: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations , 2000 .

[79]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[80]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  Environmental management, quality management and firm performance: a review of empirical studies , 2005 .

[81]  R. T. Lenz.  Strategic Capability: A Concept And Framework for Analysis , 1980 .

[82]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[83]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  The impact of HR configuration on firm performance in Singapore: a resource-based explanation , 2005 .

[84]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[85]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.