Estimation of the cortical connectivity by high-resolution EEG and structural equation modeling: Simulations and application to finger tapping data

Today, the concept of brain connectivity plays a central role in the neuroscience. While functional connectivity is defined as the temporal coherence between the activities of different brain areas, the effective connectivity is defined as the simplest brain circuit that would produce the same temporal relationship as observed experimentally between cortical sites. The most used method to estimate effective connectivity in neuroscience is the structural equation modeling (SEM), typically used on data related to the brain hemodynamic behavior. However, the use of hemodynamic measures limits the temporal resolution on which the brain process can be followed. The present research proposes the use of the SEM approach on the cortical waveforms estimated from the high-resolution EEG data, which exhibits a good spatial resolution and a higher temporal resolution than hemodynamic measures. We performed a simulation study, in which different main factors were systematically manipulated in the generation of test signals, and the errors in the estimated connectivity were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Such factors were the signal-to-noise ratio and the duration of the simulated cortical activity. Since SEM technique is based on the use of a model formulated on the basis of anatomical and physiological constraints, different experimental conditions were analyzed, in order to evaluate the effect of errors made in the a priori model formulation on its performances. The feasibility of the proposed approach has been shown in a human study using high-resolution EEG recordings related to finger tapping movements.

[1]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[2]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[4]  C. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets , 2002 .

[5]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[7]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Structural modeling of functional neural pathways mapped with 2-deoxyglucose: effects of acoustic startle habituation on the auditory system , 1991, Brain Research.

[9]  A. Urbano,et al.  Dynamic functional coupling of high resolution EEG potentials related to unilateral internally triggered one-digit movements. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[12]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Dynamics of the human alpha rhythm: evidence for non-linearity? , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[17]  P. Hansen Numerical tools for analysis and solution of Fredholm integral equations of the first kind , 1992 .

[18]  John W Belliveau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Peter Stoeter,et al.  Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[23]  S. G. Andino,et al.  Distributed Source Models: Standard Solutions and New Developments , 1999 .

[24]  H Preißl,et al.  Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks , 1991 .

[25]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. II. Preparation and feedback. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[28]  P. Rossini,et al.  Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of sensors , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[29]  W. J. Nowack Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995, Neurology.

[30]  Arthur K. Liu,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain imaging , 2000 .

[31]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Functional coupling and regional activation of human cortical motor areas during simple, internally paced and externally paced finger movements. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  The Functional Brain Connectivity Workshop: report and commentary , 2003, Network.

[33]  Bin He,et al.  Boundary Element Method-Based Cortical Potential Imaging of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Using Subjects' Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002, NeuroImage.