Abstract As platforms age, there are increasing challenges to perpetuate their integrity. Currently, process of life extension and repair decision-making model in ageing offshore platforms which was based on DHGF algorithm was established built in order to make reasonable predictions about of life of ageing offshore platforms, and to make accurate repair decisions and to reduce their risks under uncertain and complicated environment. A decision on whether to install new equipment or recondition existing ones could then be taken in terms of optimal life-cycle cost, reliability, project budgets and safe state. There were 18 indicators based on Delphi method for evaluation system. Hierarchical structures were set up by analyzing and adjusting four dimensions - project factors, risk factors, load factors and structure factors which affect the ageing platform service state. Weighted subset was determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Then, we can calculate the gray weights using the gray model theory. The next step is that, it applied fuzzy mathematics to determine the grade evaluation of ageing platform. The evaluation criteria of life extension and repair decision-making model in ageing offshore platforms were established. The comprehensive score was calculated by a sequence of computational steps. Furthermore, life extension and repair decision-making reference table was set up and the period of life extension and repair grade in offshore platform was determined in the light of this table. Life extension and repair decisions for two platforms were made by using this new model and the results were compared with the traditional methods. Research results display that this model can describe the dynamic economic lifetime of ageing offshore platforms more accurately and give a new resolution for the research of life extension and repair decision-making under uncertain and complicated environment.
[1]
Gary Davis,et al.
Physical risk factors and controls for musculoskeletal disorders in construction trades
,
2006
.
[2]
Minna Nissilä,et al.
Challenges in risk management in multi-company industrial parks
,
2010
.
[3]
Chen Guoming.
Safety comprehensive assessment method based on set pair analysis and its application
,
2006
.
[4]
Tian Yan-qing,et al.
Study on the risk assessment model for workplace based on matter element analysis
,
2011
.
[5]
Wu Ya.
Freeway Traffic Safety Facilities Evaluation Based on Set Pair Analysis
,
2014
.
[6]
Shang Xu-guang.
Study on Affecting Factors of Risks at Workplace Based on ISM and AHP
,
2011
.
[7]
Thomas L. Saaty,et al.
Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks
,
2005
.
[8]
Su Yue-fen.
Evaluation Model of Early Warning for Pollution Emission Reduction Management Based on Set Pair Analysis Method and Improved Application
,
2015
.
[9]
Geng Leihua,et al.
Set pair analysis model for river health system assessment
,
2008
.
[10]
Thomas L. Saaty,et al.
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
,
1990
.
[11]
He Chuan.
Research of occupational hazards classification index to toxic chemicals in the workplace based on AHP
,
2009
.
[12]
檀菲菲 Tan Feifei,et al.
Assessment on coordinative ability of sustainable development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on set pair analysis
,
2014
.
[13]
Zhang Zhong-bin.
Study on method of comprehensive assessment on occupational hazards at workplaces
,
2010
.
[14]
Liu Guan-nan.
Model for estimating rock burst risk in a coal mine based on set pair analysis
,
2011
.