Live Geography - Interoperable Geo-sensor Webs Facilitating the Vision of Digital Earth

In the last decade, rapidly declining sensor costs and intense research in sensor technologies lead to the deployment of a number of sensor networks. However, most of these sensor networks are monolithic stovepipe-like systems causing limited interoperability and reusability of both data and workflow components. We present a Live Geography approach which integrates real-time measurement data in a fully standardised infrastructure and couples it with Complex Event Processing (CEP). We demonstrate the interoperability of this geo-sensor web approach and the resulting high degree of flexibility and portability beyond single monitoring applications generally and for five concrete real-world implementations in different application fields. We prove that the Live Geography approach allows for reacting to observed changes through sophisticated embedded processing based on OGC standards such as Sensor Observation Service (SOS) and Sensor Alert Service (SAS). Finally, we discuss how this approach contributes to the vision of Digital Earth as described by Al Gore in 1998 and how it contributes to monitor continuously the status of the environment, of urban infrastructure and the location and health conditions of persons to support an understanding of dynamic processes, to enhance prediction of developments, and to serve Spatial Decision Support Systems.

[1]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information , 2007 .

[2]  George Percivall,et al.  The application of open standards to enhance the interoperability of geoscience information , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[3]  Julie Bosch,et al.  Integrating standards in data QA/QC into OpenGeospatial Consortium sensor observation services , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[4]  Bin Zhou,et al.  Distributed geospatial information processing: sharing distributed geospatial resources to support Digital Earth , 2008, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[5]  Stefano Nativi The implementation of international geospatial standards for earth and space sciences , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Live Geography -- Embedded Sensing for Standarised Urban Environmental Monitoring , 2009 .

[7]  M. Zardini,et al.  Sense of the city : an alternate approach to urbanism , 2005 .

[8]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Service Oriented Sensor Web , 2007 .

[9]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Situation awareness via abductive reasoning from Semantic Sensor data: A preliminary report , 2009, 2009 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[10]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Urban Sensing Revisited - Common Scents: Towards Standardised Geo-sensor Networks for Public Health Monitoring in the City , 2009 .

[11]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano , 2006, IEEE Internet Computing.

[12]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Live Geography - Interoperable Geo-Sensor Webs Enabling Portability in Monitoring Applications , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services.

[13]  Alexandros Labrinidis,et al.  Introduction to Advances in Geosensor Networks , 2006, GSN.

[14]  George Percivall,et al.  Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture. , 2007 .

[15]  G. Olsson,et al.  Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process , 1969 .

[16]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Near Real-Time Geo-Analyses for Emergency Support: A Radiation Safety Exercise , 2011 .

[17]  A. Gore The digital earth : Understanding our planet in the 21st century , 1998 .

[18]  Bernd Resch,et al.  Pervasive Monitoring—An Intelligent Sensor Pod Approach for Standardised Measurement Infrastructures , 2010, Sensors.

[19]  Silvia Nittel,et al.  A Survey of Geosensor Networks: Advances in Dynamic Environmental Monitoring , 2009, Sensors.

[20]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Computing Urban Mobile Landscapes Through Monitoring Population Density Based On Cell-phone Chatting , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Hamilton,et al.  Soil embedded networked systems for studying soil carbon dynamics: the A-MARSS project , 2005 .

[22]  David M. Mark,et al.  Next-Generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science , 2008, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[23]  Nitaigour P. Mahalik,et al.  Sensor Networks and Configuration: Fundamentals, Standards, Platforms, and Applications , 2006 .

[24]  Matt Welsh,et al.  CitySense: A Vision for an Urban-Scale Wireless Networking Testbed , 2007 .

[25]  Agathoniki Trigoni,et al.  A drift-tolerant model for data management in ocean sensor networks , 2007, MobiDE '07.

[26]  Bernd Resch,et al.  An Approach towards Real-Time Data Exchange Platform System Architecture (concise contribution) , 2008, 2008 Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[27]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Chapter 10 Live Urbanism – Towards Senseable Cities and Beyond , 2011 .