How Do Employment Effects of Job Creation Schemes Differ with Respect to the Foregoing Unemployment Duration?

Based on new administrative data for Germany covering entrances into job creation schemes between July 2000 and May 2001, we evaluate the effects of this active labour market policy programme on the employability of the participating individuals. The programme effects are estimated considering the timing of treatment in the individual unemployment spell. Applying propensity score matching in a dynamic setting where the time until treatment in the unemployment spell is stratified into quarters, regional (East and West Germany) as well as gender differences are considered in the estimation. As matching is concerned with selection on observables only, we test the robustness of the estimates against possible unobserved influences. The results in terms of employment present a mixed picture. For West Germany, most of the estimates are insignificant at the end of the observation period, but positive exceptions are found for persons starting in the fifth or ninth quarter of the unemployment spell. For East Germany, none of the groups experiences an improvement of the labour market situation. Instead, the majority of the estimates establish negative employment effects until the end of the observation period (30 months after start of programmes). Hence, job creation schemes decrease the employment chances of the participating individuals.

[1]  Bernd Fitzenberger,et al.  Employment effects of the provision of specific professional skills and techniques in Germany , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Stephan L. Thomsen,et al.  Sectoral Heterogeneity in the Employment Effects of Job Creation Schemes in Germany , 2006 .

[3]  Florian Kraus,et al.  Do public works programs work? Some unpleasant results from the East German experience , 1998 .

[4]  Robert J. LaLonde,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE SELECTION AND INITIAL CONDITIONS IN DURATION MODELS: EVIDENCE FROM EXPERIMENTAL DATA ON TRAINING , 1996 .

[5]  B. Sianesi.  Swedish active labour market programmes in the 1990s: Overall effectiveness and differential performance , 2002 .

[6]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[7]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Long-Run Effects of Public Sector Sponsored Training in West Germany , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  B. Sianesi.  Differential Effects of Swedish Active Labour Market Programmes for Unemployed Adults During the 1990s , 2001 .

[9]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[10]  M. Lechner.  Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  D. Rubin.  [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[12]  O. Hübler.  Evaluation beschäftigungspolitischer Maßnahmen in Ostdeutschland / An Evaluation of Employment Measures in Eastern Germany , 1997 .

[13]  B. Sianesi.  An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s , 2004, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models , 2003 .

[15]  B. Sianesi.  An evaluation of the active labour market programmes in Sweden , 2001 .

[16]  Stephan L. Thomsen,et al.  The Employment Effects of Job Creation Schemes in Germany: A Microeconometric Evaluation , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Heidi Steiger.  Is less more? A look at nonparticipation in Swiss active labour market programmes , 2004 .

[18]  C. Granger.  Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment , 1986 .

[19]  M. Lechner.  Earnings and Employment Effects of Continuous Gff-the-Job Training in East Germany After Unification , 1995 .

[20]  Stefan Bender,et al.  Die IAB-Beschäftigtenstichprobe , 2002 .

[21]  Michael Lechner,et al.  An Evaluation of Public Employment Programmes in the East German State of Sachsen-Anhalt , 1998 .

[22]  D. Basu.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[23]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programs: Evidence from France, 1986–1988 , 2000 .

[24]  C. Glymour,et al.  STATISTICS AND CAUSAL INFERENCE , 1985 .

[25]  Stephan L. Thomsen,et al.  New Evidence on the Effects of Job Creation Schemes in Germany - a Matching Approach with Threefold Heterogeneity , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  The Pre-Program Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Implications for Simple Program Evaluation Strategies , 1999 .

[27]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Balanced Risk Set Matching , 2001 .

[28]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .

[29]  A. Roy.  Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings , 1951 .

[30]  Stephan L. Thomsen,et al.  Identifying effect heterogeneity to improve the efficiency of job creation schemes in Germany , 2008 .

[31]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[32]  Bernd Fitzenberger,et al.  Déjà Vu? Short-term training in Germany 1980–1992 and 2000–2003 , 2008, Empirical Economics.

[33]  M. Lechner,et al.  Does Subsidised Temporary Employment Get the Unemployed Back to Work? An Econometric Analysis of Two Different Schemes , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Jeffrey A. Smith.  A Critical Survey of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies , 2000 .

[35]  J. Neyman,et al.  Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation , 1935 .

[36]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[38]  Evaluation der Eingliederungseffekte von Arbeitsbeschaffungsmaßnahmen in reguläre Beschäftigung für Teilnehmer in Deutschland (Evaluation of the effects of job-creation measures as regards integration into regular employment for participants in Germany) , 2005 .

[39]  A. Aakvik,et al.  Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program , 2001 .

[40]  P. Johansson,et al.  Dynamic Treatment Assignment , 2004 .

[41]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs , 1999 .

[42]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Training the East German Labour Force: Microeconometric Evaluations of continuous Vocational Training after Unification , 1998 .

[43]  Christopher A. Sims,et al.  Advances in Econometrics , 1996 .

[44]  Reinhard Hujer,et al.  Macroeconomic Impacts of Job Creation Schemes on the Matching Process in West Germany , 2005 .

[45]  Florian Kraus,et al.  Do public works programs work in Eastern Germany , 2000 .

[46]  Michael Lechner,et al.  The Curse and Blessing of Training the Unemployed in a Changing Economy: The Case of East Germany After Unification , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Uwe Blien,et al.  Typisierung von Bezirken der Agenturen für Arbeit , 2004 .

[48]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  A. Ullah,et al.  Nonparametric Econometrics , 1999 .

[50]  M. Lechner,et al.  A Microeconometric Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policy in Switzerland , 2001 .

[51]  A. Dawid.  Causal Inference without Counterfactuals , 2000 .

[52]  R. Rohh.  ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS An Overview , 2001 .

[53]  An Evaluation of Public Employment Programmes in the East German State of Sachsen-Anhalt , 2002 .

[54]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Introductory Remarks on Neyman (1923) , 1990 .

[55]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[56]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies , 1999 .

[57]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[58]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[59]  M. Lechner.  Training the East German Labour Force , 1998 .

[60]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? , 2000 .

[61]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Microeconometric Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Policy in Switzerland , 2000 .