Kicking out the trolls - Antecedents of social exclusion intentions in Facebook groups

Abstract When contributing to groups on social networking sites (SNS), not all group members necessarily adhere to the group's norms (i.e., its explicit or implicit rules); in other words, they show norm-deviant behavior. Despite the popularity of groups on SNS and the frequency of norm-deviant behavior within them, research has to date rarely investigated how members of online groups react to those behaviors. This article introduces a model based on the social identity approach regarding the responses to norm-deviations in Facebook groups and reports an experiment testing this model. In this experiment, deviant members were perceived as questioning what the group stands for (i.e., as subverting the group's identity). Perceptions of identity subversion, in turn, motivated group members to derogate and exclude the deviate. Furthermore, participants were found to ignore the deviate's contributions (i.e., not to recall them after reading the group's timeline). Taken together, the results suggest that group members perceive a deviate's behavior as questioning their group's image. This, however, does not seem to lead to a group's decay, but rather promotes a “natural purification” within the group through elimination of negative influences.

[1]  S. Schachter Deviation, rejection, and communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  Spencer B. Nicholls,et al.  A Dual-Identity Model of Responses to Deviance in Online Groups: Integrating Social Identity Theory and Expectancy Violations Theory , 2017 .

[3]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect? , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[5]  F. Sani,et al.  Identity, Argument and Schism: Two Longitudinal Studies of the Split in the Church of England over the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood , 1999 .

[6]  J. Levine,et al.  Group Socialization: Theory and Research , 1994 .

[7]  J. Blascovich,et al.  Challenge, threat, and subjective group dynamics: Reactions to normative and deviant group members. , 2012 .

[8]  Kai J. Jonas,et al.  Attitude change and social influence on the net , 2009 .

[9]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Opinion-based groups: (racist) talk and (collective) action on the Internet , 2010 .

[10]  D. Abrams,et al.  Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Common voice: Analysis of behavior modification and content convergence in a popular online community , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in computer-mediated communication , 2001 .

[13]  Steven Walczak,et al.  Unfriending on Facebook: Friend Request and Online/Offline Behavior Analysis , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Norm evolution and violation on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..

[15]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Negative emotional and cognitive responses to being unfriended on Facebook: An exploratory study , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[17]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[18]  M. Biernat,et al.  Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? , 2003 .

[19]  Bryn Alexander Coles,et al.  Weaving the internet together: Imagined communities in newspaper comment threads , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Paul Baker,et al.  Moral Panic and Alternative Identity Construction in Usenet , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[23]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Regulating anti-social behavior on the Internet: The example of League of Legends , 2013 .

[24]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[25]  John Todman,et al.  Should We Stay or Should We Go? A Social Psychological Model of Schisms in Groups , 2002 .

[26]  C. F. Bond,et al.  One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described , 2003 .

[27]  K. Sassenberg Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. , 2002 .

[28]  D. Abrams,et al.  Innovation credit: when can leaders oppose their group's norms? , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities , 2015, ICWSM.

[30]  D. Abrams,et al.  Being better by being right: subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  It’s either you or me! Impact of deviations on social exclusion and leaving , 2016 .

[32]  F. Sani,et al.  In the name of Mussolini: Explaining the schism in an Italian right-wing political party. , 2008 .

[33]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation , 2005 .

[34]  Jorge Peña,et al.  Intentions to hide and unfriend Facebook connections based on perceptions of sender attractiveness and status updates , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[36]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  How Do We Assign Punishment? The Impact of Minimal and Maximal Standards on the Evaluation of Deviants , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[37]  R. Ruback,et al.  Reaction to Opinion Deviance: Impact of a Fence Straddler's Rationale on Majority Evaluation , 1980 .

[38]  F. Reid Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[39]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms , 2003 .

[40]  Matt C. Howard An epidemiological assessment of online groups and a test of a typology: What are the (dis)similarities of the online group types? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  R. Spears,et al.  The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups , 2002 .

[42]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  The impact of discrepancies from ingroup norms on group members' well-being and motivation , 2011 .

[43]  D. Abrams,et al.  Running Header : DEVIANCE AND IDENTITY MAINTENANCE Getting rid of the bad ones : The relationship between group identification , deviant derogation , and identity maintenance , 2018 .

[44]  P. Silvia,et al.  Responding to Deviance: Target Exclusion and Differential Devaluation , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[45]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[46]  M. Hogg,et al.  The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members , 2006 .