UAV navigation by an expert system for contaminant mapping with a genetic algorithm

Source characterization for an unknown contaminant release can be achieved by inverting an atmospheric transport and dispersion model given concentration observations from a moderately dense spatial array at one or more times. Achieving the required observation density over large geographic regions can, however, be prohibitively expensive if fixed sensors are employed. Mobile sensors provide a cost-saving alternative, with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) being particularly well suited for these large-area problems because of their relatively high speed. The challenge then becomes to devise a set of navigation rules by which the aircraft can determine the route which most expeditiously acquires the required concentration observations. This task involves physical reasoning based on the wind vector, ongoing concentration observations, and current estimates of source position to plan leg length and direction. Each flight leg is planned based on data from all of the prior legs, the flight plan adapts to the observations as they are taken. Expert system navigation systems are developed for two situations: instantaneous (puff) and continuous (plume) releases. Of the two the puff poses the greater challenge because it provides a moving target rather than a quasi-steady concentration pattern. Thus, this rule-based navigation system must guide the UAV to an intercept for each pass through the puff rather than just sweeping across the contaminant field at multiple downwind distances as suffices with a plume. The navigation systems are tested in a virtual world consisting of a single fixed wind and concentration sensor, a UAV with wind and concentration sensing capability, a uniform wind at a significant fraction of the UAV airspeed, and a simple Gaussian dispersion model. The resulting concentration data is used to characterize the source strength and location by using a genetic algorithm to tune the variables until the model output matches the observations. Tests conducted using randomized source locations indicate that these UAV navigation systems are sophisticated enough to successfully acquire the necessary concentration data in the majority of the cases. The success rate is greatly improved by using an ensemble of non-communicating UAVs and taking the median of the resulting source variables. This process eliminates the outliers that result from occasional navigational failures.

[1]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Validation of a Receptor–Dispersion Model Coupled with a Genetic Algorithm Using Synthetic Data , 2006 .

[2]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Evolving Coordinated Behavior by Maximizing Information Structure , 2006 .

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Mapping Information Flow in Sensorimotor Networks , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[5]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Improving pollutant source characterization by better estimating wind direction with a genetic algorithm , 2007 .

[6]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm Method to Assimilate Sensor Data for a Toxic Contaminant Release , 2007, J. Comput..

[7]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  A demonstration of coupled receptor/dispersion modeling with a genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[8]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Source Characterization with a Genetic Algorithm–Coupled Dispersion–Backward Model Incorporating SCIPUFF , 2007 .

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Assessing sensitivity of source term estimation , 2010 .

[11]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook Practical Genetic Algorithms (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[12]  L. Singh,et al.  Trajectory generation for a UAV in urban terrain, using nonlinear MPC , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[13]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Practical Genetic Algorithms , 1998 .