Regular Article: Extension of Finite Volume Compressible Flow Solvers to Multi-dimensional, Variable Density Zero Mach Number Flows

When attempting to compute unsteady, variable density flows at very small or zero Mach number using a standard finite volume compressible flow solver one faces at least the following difficulties: (i) Spatial pressure variations vanish as the Mach number M->0, but they do affect the velocity field at leading order; (ii) the resulting spatial homogeneity of the leading order pressure implies an elliptic divergence constraint for the energy flux; (iii) violations of this constraint crucially affect the transport of mass, preventing a code to properly advect even a constant density distribution. We overcome these difficulties through a new algorithm for constructing numerical fluxes in the context of multi-dimensional finite volume methods in conservation form. The construction of numerical fluxes involves: (1) An explicit upwind step yielding predictions for the nonlinear convective flux components. (2) A first correction step that introduces pressure gradients which guarantee compliance of the convective fluxes with a divergence constraint. This step requires the solution of a first Poisson-type equation. (3) A second projection step which provides the yet unknown (non-convective) pressure contribution to the total flux of momentum. This second projection requires the solution of another Poisson-type equation and yields the cell centered velocity field at the new time. This velocity field exactly satisfies a divergence constraint consistent with the asymptotic limit. Step (1) can be done by any standard finite volume compressible flow solver. The input to steps (2) and (3) involves solely the fluxes from step (1) and is independent of how these were obtained. Thus, our approach allows any such solver to be extended to compute variable density incompressible flows.

[1]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow , 1977 .

[2]  U. Ghia,et al.  High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method , 1982 .

[3]  R. Klein,et al.  A capturing - tracking hybrid scheme for deflagration discontinuities , 1997 .

[4]  Hester Bijl,et al.  A Unified Method for Computing Incompressible and Compressible Flows in Boundary-Fitted Coordinates , 1998 .

[5]  Cécile Viozat,et al.  Implicit Upwind Schemes for Low Mach Number Compressible Flows , 1997 .

[6]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .

[7]  Philip M. Gresho,et al.  On the theory of semi‐implicit projection methods for viscous incompressible flow and its implementation via a finite element method that also introduces a nearly consistent mass matrix. Part 1: Theory , 1990 .

[8]  J. Peraire,et al.  Compressible and incompressible flow; an algorithm for all seasons , 1990 .

[9]  R. Courant,et al.  Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik , 1928 .

[10]  G. Strang On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes , 1968 .

[11]  C. Schulz-Rinne,et al.  The Riemann problem for two-dimensional gas dynamics and new limiters for high-order schemes , 1993 .

[12]  E. Puckett,et al.  A High-Order Projection Method for Tracking Fluid Interfaces in Variable Density Incompressible Flows , 1997 .

[13]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monotonicity , 1973 .

[14]  P. Colella,et al.  A Conservative Adaptive Projection Method for the Variable Density Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[15]  John B. Bell,et al.  An Adaptive Projection Method for Unsteady, Low-Mach Number Combustion , 1998 .

[16]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[17]  A. Chorin Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations , 1968 .

[18]  P. Wesseling An Introduction to Multigrid Methods , 1992 .

[19]  S. Patankar,et al.  Pressure based calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in arbitrary configurations , 1988 .

[20]  J. Bell,et al.  A Second-Order Projection Method for Variable- Density Flows* , 1992 .

[21]  H. Guillard,et al.  On the behaviour of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit , 1999 .

[22]  R. Klein Semi-implicit extension of a Godunov-type scheme based on low Mach number asymptotics , 1995 .

[23]  A. Majda,et al.  Compressible and incompressible fluids , 1982 .

[24]  D. Spalding,et al.  A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , 1972 .

[25]  Jörn Lothar Sesterhenn,et al.  Zur numerischen Berechnung kompressibler Strömungen bei kleinen Mach-Zahlen , 1995 .

[26]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1991 .

[27]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[28]  Jörn Sesterhenn,et al.  Flux-vector splitting for compressible low Mach number flow , 1993 .

[29]  M. Perić,et al.  FINITE VOLUME METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF FLUID FLOW IN ARBITRARILY SHAPED DOMAINS WITH MOVING BOUNDARIES , 1990 .

[30]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection , 1977 .

[31]  S. Schochet Asymptotics for symmetric hyperbolic systems with a large parameter , 1988 .

[32]  Charles-Henri Bruneau,et al.  An efficient scheme for solving steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[33]  P. Colella,et al.  A second-order projection method for the incompressible navier-stokes equations , 1989 .