Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Background: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) may provide valuable measures of cartilage morphology in osteoarthritis (OA) but has been confined to sequences with relatively long acquisition times at 1.5 Tesla (T). Objective: To test the accuracy and precision of knee cartilage qMRI with a fast double echo, steady state (DESS) sequence with water excitation (we) at 3 T. Methods: As a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative, test-retest MR images were acquired in the knees of 19 participants with no OA to moderate degrees of clinical OA. Two double oblique coronal fast low angle shot (FLASHwe) sequences (1.5 mm slice thickness) were acquired at 3 T, and two sagittal DESSwe sequences (0.7 mm slice thickness). Double oblique coronal multiplanar reformats (MPR) were performed (1.5 mm slice thickness) from the sagittal DESSwe. Knee joint cartilage plates were quantified unpaired in random order with blinding to subject identification. Results: In the femorotibial joint, precision errors (root mean square coefficient of variation in % for unpaired analysis) for cartilage volume and thickness were 3.0–6.4% with coronal FLASHwe, 2.4–6.2% with coronal MPR DESSwe, and 2.3–8.2% with sagittal DESSwe. Correlation coefficients between DESSwe and FLASHwe ranged from r = 0.88 to 1.0. In the femoropatellar joint, precision errors (sagittal DESSwe) were 3.4–8.5%. Conclusions: DESSwe permits accurate and precise analysis of cartilage morphology in the femorotibial joint at 3 T. Further studies are needed to examine the accuracy of DESSwe in the femoropatellar joint and its ability to characterise sensitivity to longitudinal changes in cartilage morphology.

[1]  F Eckstein,et al.  In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  T J Mosher,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: Role of contrast in lesion detection , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in patella cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  T. Vogl,et al.  Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  C G Peterfy,et al.  Scratching the surface: articular cartilage disorders in the knee. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[11]  R Burgkart,et al.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  F Eckstein,et al.  Cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients after seven weeks of partial load bearing. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[15]  Y. Xia,et al.  Biochemical (and functional) imaging of articular cartilage. , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[16]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Femoro‐tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  New MRI Techniques for Imaging Cartilage , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  Role of MR imaging in clinical research studies. , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[19]  R Burgkart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  R Burgkart,et al.  Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  F Eckstein,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients with spinal cord injury. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  David Thomasson,et al.  Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free‐precession sequence for imaging cartilage , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.