Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium Using Dual-Energy Subtraction Digital Radiography

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of global mortality, yet its early detection remains a vexing problem of modern medicine. Although the computed tomography (CT) calcium score predicts cardiovascular risk, relatively high cost ($250–400) and radiation dose (1–3 mSv) limit its universal utility as a screening tool. Dual-energy digital subtraction radiography (DE; <$60, 0.07 mSv) enables detection of calcified structures with high sensitivity. In this pilot study, we examined DE radiography’s ability to quantify coronary artery calcification (CAC). We identified 25 patients who underwent non-contrast CT and DE chest imaging performed within 12 months using documented CAC as the major inclusion criteria. A DE calcium score was developed based on pixel intensity multiplied by the area of the calcified plaque. DE scores were plotted against CT scores. Subsequently, a validation cohort of 14 additional patients was independently evaluated to confirm the accuracy and precision of CAC quantification, yielding a total of 39 subjects. Among all subjects (n = 39), the DE score demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.87 (p < 0.0001) when compared with the CT score. For the 13 patients with CT scores of <400, the correlation coefficient was −0.26. For the 26 patients with CT scores of ≥400, the correlation coefficient yielded 0.86. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of DE radiography to identify patients at the highest cardiovascular risk. DE radiography’s accuracy at lower scores remains unclear. Further evaluation of DE radiography as an inexpensive and low-radiation imaging tool to diagnose cardiovascular disease appears warranted.

[1]  William S Weintraub,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular events with coronary calcium scoring. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Stein,et al.  Radiation and coronary calcium screening. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[4]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Daniel S Berman,et al.  Cost effectiveness of screening for cardiovascular disease with measures of coronary calcium. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[6]  T Hirano,et al.  Plain chest radiograph with computed radiography: improved sensitivity for the detection of coronary artery calcification. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification. , 2006, Medical physics.

[8]  R. Gilkeson,et al.  Digital radiography with dual-energy subtraction: improved evaluation of cardiac calcification. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Baowei Fei,et al.  Automatic Registration of CT Volumes and Dual-Energy Digital Radiography for Detection of Cardiac and Lung Diseases , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[11]  M. Roizen,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2010 .

[12]  Mark A. Hlatky,et al.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2007 .

[13]  H C Lukaski,et al.  Soft tissue composition and bone mineral status: evaluation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1993, The Journal of nutrition.

[14]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  L T Niklason,et al.  Dual-energy digital radiographic quantification of calcium in simulated pulmonary nodules. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W R Brody,et al.  A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[17]  E. Topol,et al.  Prevalence of Conventional Risk Factors in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease , 2003 .

[18]  Moyses Szklo,et al.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  B. Fei,et al.  Automatic 3D-to-2D registration for CT and dual-energy digital radiography for calcification detection. , 2007, Medical physics.

[21]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[22]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary arterial calcium by dual energy digital subtraction fluoroscopy. , 1991, Medical physics.

[23]  Rolf W Günther,et al.  Value of conventional chest radiography for the detection of coronary calcifications: comparison with MSCT. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Ming-Ting Wu,et al.  Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening: concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  S J Riederer,et al.  Dual-energy projection radiography: initial clinical experience. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.