THE CDIO APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT SKILLS AND ATTRIBUTES

The CDIO approach includes a methodology for embedding the development of student skills and attributes in an engineering program. The methodology starts with the CDIO Syllabus which features a comprehensive list of skills and attributes. After progressing through a series of steps, an explicit plan is produced which indicates how the required skills and attributes should be developed within the curriculum. Implementing the methodology poses a number of challenges and these are discussed. It is also noted that other initiatives to improve graduate skills, dating back 10 to 15 years, have not resulted in any discernable improvement. The literature is then consulted and this leads to a number of proposals for enhancing the CDIO methodology. The outcome is a methodology that is more demanding to implement and further work is needed to provide support for the additional tasks that have been proposed. However it is argued that the enhanced methodology is more likely to ensure that students will graduate with the skills and attributes they require to become professional engineers.

[1]  Dennis Truax Improving The Learning Process Of Laboratory Instruction , 2004 .

[2]  George D. Kuh The other Curriculum: Out-of-Class Experiences Associated with Student Learning and Personal Development , 1995 .

[3]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Accidental competency formation: an investigation of behavioral learning in engineering education , 2007 .

[4]  G. Scott,et al.  Using successful graduates to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering programmes , 2002 .

[5]  Sue R Whittle,et al.  Mapping generic skills curricula: a recommended methodology , 2005 .

[6]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[7]  Michael Hanyak,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Progressively Developing Students' Team and Problem Solving Skills Across the Curriculum , 2002 .

[8]  Guy Tchibozo Extra-Curricular Activity and the Transition from Higher Education to Work: A Survey of Graduates in the United Kingdom. , 2007 .

[9]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria , 2003 .

[10]  Ronald L. Miller,et al.  Defining the outcomes: a framework for EC-2000 , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[11]  April A. Kedrowicz AC 2007-221: DEVELOPING COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE: A COMPARISON OF THE INTENSIVE CAPSTONE EXPERIENCE AND DEVELOPMENTAL INTEGRATION , 2007 .

[12]  Corinne S. Lengsfeld,et al.  Engineering Concepts and Communication: A Two-Quarter Course Sequence , 2004 .

[13]  Perry Armstrong,et al.  The Development of a Capstone Project Course based on CDIO Principles , 2006 .

[14]  Pragati Jain,et al.  Generic graduate attributes: A research based framework for a shared vision , 2003 .

[15]  P. Hoadley The Asce Bok And Attitudes Assessment , 2007 .

[16]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Embedding employability into the curriculum , 2006 .

[17]  Fulfilling Abet Outcomes By Sending Students Away , 2007 .

[18]  Thomas J. Brumm,et al.  Using a First-Year Learning Community to Help Meet Departmental Program Objectives in Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering , 2001 .

[19]  N.L. Fortenberry,et al.  Linking student learning outcomes to instructional practices - phase II , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[20]  David F. Radcliffe,et al.  Innovation as a Meta-Attribute for Graduate Engineers* , 2005 .

[21]  Andrea L. Welker,et al.  Information Literacy: Skills For Life , 2005 .

[22]  DEVELOPING GENERIC SKILLS: EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE In July last year the Business/ Higher Education Round Table (B-HERT) published a Position Paper on “ENHANCING THE LEARNING AND EMPLOYABILITY OF GRADUATES: THE ROLE OF GENERIC SKILLS”. The Position , .

[23]  Susannah Howe,et al.  2005 National Survey Of Engineering Capstone Design Courses , 2006 .

[25]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[26]  S. Barrie,et al.  A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes , 2007 .

[27]  Maliaca Oxnam The informed engineer , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[28]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  A Systematic Approach to the Design and Development of Design-Build-Test Project Courses , 2005 .

[29]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Systems Thinking And Integrative Learning Outcomes , 2007 .

[30]  R. Culver,et al.  Preparing students for ABET a-k , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[31]  Julie L. Swann,et al.  Engineering Ethical Curricula: Assessment and Comparison of Two Approaches , 2005 .

[32]  O. Gol,et al.  Project-based teaching in engineering programs , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[33]  S. Cranmer Enhancing graduate employability: best intentions and mixed outcomes , 2006 .

[34]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum , 2006 .

[35]  Sabine C. Klahr,et al.  Increasing Enginering Student Participation in Study Abroad: A Study of U.S. and European Programs , 2000 .

[36]  N. J. Mouros,et al.  Defining, teaching and assessing lifelong learning skills , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[37]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[38]  David King,et al.  SKILL SETS: AN APPROACH TO EMBED EMPLOYABILITY IN COURSE DESIGN , 2006 .

[39]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? , 2005 .

[40]  Will Robley,et al.  Mapping generic skills curricula: outcomes and discussion , 2005 .

[41]  Joachim Walther,et al.  The competence dilemma in engineering education: Moving beyond simple graduate attribute mapping , 2007 .

[42]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century : Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future , 2004 .

[43]  D. Mcclelland Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". , 1973, The American psychologist.

[44]  Thomas J. Brumm,et al.  Assessing and Developing Program Outcomes through Workplace Competencies , 2006 .

[45]  Lisa Bullard,et al.  The Literate Engineer: Infusing Information Literacy Skills Throughout An Engineering Curriculum , 2006 .

[46]  Cheryl Cates,et al.  Co Op And Abet 2000: The Added Learning Dimension! , 2000 .

[47]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  AC 2007-849: ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SENIOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERS IN A CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCE , 2007 .

[48]  Ian Drummond,et al.  Personal transferable skills in higher education: the problems of implementing good practice , 1998 .

[49]  Thomas J. Brumm,et al.  The Data Are In: Student Workplace Competencies in the Experiential Workplace , 2005 .

[50]  D. Joseph Mook,et al.  Study Abroad: Preparing Engineering Students For Success In The Global Economy , 2002 .