Virtual simulation in the clinical setting: some practical considerations.

Virtual simulation departs from normal practice by replacing conventional treatment simulation with 3-dimensional image data and computer software. Implementation of virtual simulation requires the ability to transfer the planned treatment geometry from the computer to the treatment room in a way which is accurate, reproducible, and efficient enough for routine use. We have separated this process into: (a) immobilization of the patient; (b) establishment and alignment of a practical coordinate system for the patient/couch system; and (c) setup of the patient/couch been addressed by the use of hemi- or full-body foam casts, the second by use of an alignment jig on the treatment couch, and the third with the aid of a patient coordinate system referenced to easily located landmarks. Phantom studies and clinical practice have shown these techniques to be practical and effective within reasonable clinical bounds.

[1]  J Rosenman,et al.  Virtual simulation: Initial clinical results , 1991 .

[2]  M. Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye-view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  K. Winston,et al.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator , 1988 .

[4]  R Mohan,et al.  A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  L. Chin,et al.  A coordinate transfer of anatomical information from CT to treatment simulation. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M Goitein,et al.  Precise positioning of patients for radiation therapy. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Lawrence E. Reinstein,et al.  Workshop on geometric accuracy and reproducibility in radiation therapy , 1987 .

[8]  M Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: I. Delineation of anatomy. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Kevin L. Novins,et al.  The virtual simulator , 1987, I3D '86.

[10]  D L McShan,et al.  From manual to 3-D computerized treatment planning for 125-I stereotactic brain implants. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  U. Rosenow,et al.  125I interstitial brachytherapy for primary malignant brain tumors: technical aspects of treatment planning and implantation methods. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  G W Sherouse,et al.  Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  W Schlegel,et al.  Computerized optimization of 125I implants in brain tumors. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M. Goitein,et al.  Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.