Patient perspectives on engagement in decision-making in early management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a qualitative study

BackgroundSurveys of patients suggest many want to be actively involved in treatment decisions for acute coronary syndromes. However, patient experiences of their engagement and participation in early phase decision-making have not been well described.MethodsWe performed a patient led qualitative study to explore patient experiences with decision-making processes when admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Trained patient-researchers conducted the study via a three-phase approach using focus groups and semi-structured interviews and employing grounded theory methodology.ResultsTwenty patients discharged within one year of a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome participated in the study. Several common themes emerged. First, patients characterized the admission and early treatment of ACS as a rapidly unfolding process where they had little control. Participants felt they played a passive role in early phase decision-making. Furthermore, participants described feeling reduced capacity for decision-making owing to fear and mental stress from acute illness, and therefore most but not all participants were relieved that expert clinicians made decisions for them. Finally, once past the emergent phase of care, participants wanted to retake a more active role in their treatment and follow-up plans.ConclusionsPatients admitted with ACS often do not take an active role in initial clinical decisions, and are satisfied to allow the medical team to direct early phase care. These results provide important insight relevant to designing patient-centered interventions in ACS and other urgent care situations.

[1]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  Chun-Chih Lin,et al.  The emergency patient's participation in medical decision-making. , 2016, Journal of clinical nursing.

[3]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Cardiovascular Risk Factors and In-hospital Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. , 2015, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[4]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study , 1999 .

[5]  G. Rowe,et al.  What do patients really want? Patients’ preferences for treatment for angina , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  N. Wenger,et al.  The 2014 American College of Cardiology ACC/American Heart Association Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non–ST‐Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2015, Clinical cardiology.

[7]  D. Marshall,et al.  Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  D. Marshall,et al.  Support for Living a Meaningful Life with Osteoarthritis: A Patient-to-Patient Research Study , 2016, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[9]  S. Bagshaw,et al.  Patient and Family Member-Led Research in the Intensive Care Unit: A Novel Approach to Patient-Centered Research , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  FRISC score for selection of patients for an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease , 2005, Heart.

[11]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[12]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  I. Scott,et al.  Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Decision-making preferences among patients with an acute myocardial infarction. , 2013, JAMA Internal Medicine.

[15]  W. Ghali,et al.  Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. On behalf of the APPROACH investigators. , 2000, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[16]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Christina Goulding,et al.  Grounded theory , 2015 .