Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy

ObjectivesTo determine the false-negative rate and to evaluate the clinical, radiologic or histologic features of false-negative results at ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB).MethodsA total of 3,724 masses from 3,308 women who had undergone US-guided 14-gauge CNB and who had a rebiopsy or at least 2 years’ follow-up were included. The histology of CNB was correlated with the rebiopsy or long-term imaging follow-up. In cases of missed cancer, the time interval between CNB and rebiopsy, the reasons for rebiopsy, and the procedural or lesion characteristics were analysed.ResultsOf 1,706 benign CNBs, 50 additional malignancies were found at excision (false-negative rate, 2.5% of 1,982 with a final diagnosis of malignancy). Of 50 false negatives, 41 were found immediately of which 28 had rebiopsy because of imaging-histological discordance. Regarding the frequency of malignancy according to the reasons for rebiopsy, suspicious imaging finding (24%) showed significantly higher frequency than suspicious clinical findings or request (1%). Regarding the characteristics except invasiveness, no significant differences in false-negative rates were found.ConclusionsMost false negatives were found immediately and imaging-histological discordance was the most important clue. Careful correlation of clinical, radiological and histological results as well as appropriate follow-up is essential.

[1]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. , 1994, Radiology.

[2]  S. Korourian,et al.  Percutaneous excisional breast biopsy. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[3]  T. Stephens Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them , 2011 .

[4]  J. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  T. Helbich,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy , 2008, European Radiology.

[6]  Clécio Enio Murta de Lucena,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided core needle biopsy of breast masses: How many cores are necessary to diagnose cancer? , 2007, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[7]  B. Seo,et al.  Non-Calcified Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Ultrasound and Mammographic Findings Correlated with Histological Findings , 2008, Yonsei medical journal.

[8]  Julian A. Kim,et al.  Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[9]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  M. Acebal-Blanco,et al.  Sonographically guided 11‐g directional vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision: utility and cost study in probably benign lesions , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[11]  Niall O'Higgins,et al.  The Accuracy of Ultrasound, Stereotactic, and Clinical Core Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, With an Analysis of False-Negative Cases , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[12]  B. McNeil,et al.  Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[13]  Carol H Lee,et al.  Ultrasound-guided Large-Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast , 2002 .

[14]  D. Noh,et al.  US of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  P. Crystal,et al.  Accuracy of sonographically guided 14‐gauge core‐needle biopsy: Results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two‐year follow‐up of benign lesions , 2005, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[16]  W. Yang,et al.  Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  L. Liberman,et al.  Imaging–histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy , 2000 .

[18]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  R. Birdwell Role of Radiologic Features in the Management of Papillary Lesions of the Breast , 2007 .

[20]  S. T. Chen,et al.  The management of papillary lesion of the breast by core needle biopsy. , 2009, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  False‐negative core needle biopsies of the breast , 2004, Cancer.

[22]  Julian A. Kim,et al.  Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[23]  S. Parker,et al.  Methods for Analysis of One‐Step Breast Biopsy Programs , 1998 .

[24]  W. Berg Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[25]  K. Koretz,et al.  Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  Kyung Soo Cho,et al.  Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast: Comparison of 14-Gauge Automated Gun and 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods , 2005, Korean journal of radiology.

[27]  Malai Muttarak,et al.  Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  R. Brem,et al.  Fourteen‐gauge ultrasonographically guided large‐core needle biopsy of breast masses. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[29]  A. Stavros,et al.  US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. , 1993, Radiology.

[30]  L. Liberman,et al.  Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[31]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  E. Ortega García,et al.  Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[33]  J. Cangiarella,et al.  Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. , 2006, Radiology.

[34]  J. Meyer,et al.  The utility of ultrasonographically guided large‐core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[35]  I Tocino,et al.  Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. , 1999, Radiology.

[36]  L. Liberman,et al.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[37]  J. Youk,et al.  Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  L. Liberman,et al.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. , 1998, Radiology.

[39]  L. Bassett,et al.  Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[40]  M. Buchanan,et al.  Benign Papilloma on Core Biopsy Requires Surgical Excision , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[41]  T. Helbich,et al.  US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. , 2008, Radiology.