SVM classification of high resolution urban satellites Images using Haralick features

The classification of remotely sensed images knows a large progress taking into consideration the availability of images with different resolutions as well as the abundance of classification’s algorithms. SVMs (Support Vector Machines) are a group of supervised classification algorithms that have been recently used in the remote sensing field, a number of works have shown promising results by the fusion of spatial and spectral information using SVM. For this purpose, we propose a methodology allowing to combine these two information. The SVM classification was conducted using a combination of multi-spectral features and Haralick texture features as data source. We have used homogeneity, contrast, correlation, entropy and local homogeneity, which were the best texture features to improve the classification algorithm. The result will be compared with both a standard SVM classifier and a SVM classifier with a Graph Cuts approach that introduces spatial domain information applied as a post-classification. The proposed approach was tested on common scenes of urban imagery. Results showed that SVMs, especially with the use of Haralick texture features, outperform the SVM classifier with post-processing in term of the global accuracy. The experimental results indicate a mean accuracy value of 94.045 % which is very promising.

[1]  A. Benassi,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF THE COOCCURRENCE MATRIX FOR COLOUR IMAGES: APPLICATION TO COLOUR TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION , 2011 .

[2]  A. Bekkari,et al.  Classification of high resolution urban satellite images combining SVM and graph cuts , 2010, 2010 5th International Symposium On I/V Communications and Mobile Network.

[3]  Osamu Higashi,et al.  A SVM-based method to extract urban areas from DMSP-OLS and SPOT VGT data , 2009 .

[4]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Taskin Kavzoglu,et al.  Performance Analysis of Maximum Likelihood and Artificial Neural Network Classifiers for Training Sets with Mixed Pixels , 2008 .

[6]  Laëtitia Chapel,et al.  Maintenir la viabilité ou la résilience d'un système : les machines à vecteurs de support pour rompre la malédiction de la dimensionnalité ? , 2007 .

[7]  Jordi Inglada,et al.  Automatic recognition of man-made objects in high resolution optical remote sensing images by SVM classification of geometric image features , 2007 .

[8]  Pao-Shan Yu,et al.  Real-time probabilistic forecasting of flood stages , 2007 .

[9]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[10]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  A Combined Support Vector Machines Classification Based on Decision Fusion , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  What is Land Cover? , 2005 .

[12]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing , 2005 .

[13]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) , 2003 .

[14]  Guobin Zhu,et al.  Classification using ASTER data and SVM algorithms;: The case study of Beer Sheva, Israel , 2002 .

[15]  L. S. Davis,et al.  An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classi(cid:142) cation , 2002 .

[16]  Christophe Samson,et al.  Contribution à la classification d'images satellitaires par approche variationnelle et équations aux dérivées partielles , 2000 .

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[19]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[22]  Sujeevan Aseervatham,et al.  Apprentissage à base de Noyaux Sémantiques pour le Traitement de Données Textuelles. (Machine Learning with Semantic Kernels for Textual Data) , 2007 .

[23]  Isabelle Couloigner,et al.  EVALUATION OF INCORPORATING TEXTURE INTO WETLAND MAPPING FROM MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES , 2004 .

[24]  Edwin T. Engman,et al.  Status of remote sensing algorithms for estimation of land surface state parameters , 1995 .