Relationships between adaptive minimum variance beamforming and optimal source localization

For many years, the popular minimum variance (MV) adaptive beamformer has been well known for not having been derived as a maximum likelihood (ML) estimator. This paper demonstrates that by use of a judicious decomposition of the signal and noise, the log-likelihood function of source location is, in fact, directly proportional to the adaptive MV beamformer output power. In the proposed model, the measurement consists of an unknown temporal signal whose spatial wavefront is known as a function of its unknown location, which is embedded in complex Gaussian noise with unknown but positive definite covariance. Further, in cases where the available observation time is insufficient, a constrained ML estimator is derived here that is closely related to MV beamforming with a diagonally loaded data covariance matrix estimate. The performance of the constrained ML estimator compares favorably with robust MV techniques, giving slightly better root-mean-square error (RMSE) angle-of-arrival estimation of a plane-wave signal in interference. More importantly, however, the fact that such optimal ML techniques are closely related to conventional robust MV methods, such as diagonal loading, lends theoretical justification to the use of these practical approaches.

[1]  R. S. Walker,et al.  High-Resolution Spatial Processing with Short Observation Times , 1989 .

[2]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics , 1993 .

[3]  Katsuhiko Ogata,et al.  Modern Control Engineering , 1970 .

[4]  Hao Ye,et al.  Maximum likelihood DOA estimation and asymptotic Cramer-Rao bounds for additive unknown colored noise , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  Henry Cox,et al.  Robust adaptive beamforming , 2005, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[7]  J. Krolik Matched‐field minimum variance beamforming in a random ocean channel , 1992 .

[8]  Stacy L. Tantum,et al.  Tracking and localizing a moving source in an uncertain shallow water environment , 1998 .

[9]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[10]  I. Olkin,et al.  Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications , 1980 .

[11]  Jeffrey L. Krolik Sensor array processing performance evaluation via bootstrap resampling , 1994 .

[12]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .

[13]  R. T. Lacoss Autoregressive and Maximum Likelihood Spectral Analysis Methods , 1977 .

[14]  S. Applebaum,et al.  Adaptive arrays , 1976 .

[15]  T. Marzetta A new interpretation of Capon's maximum likelihood method of frequency-wavenumber spectral estimation , 1983 .

[16]  Jeffrey L. Krolik,et al.  The performance of matched-field beamformers with Mediterranean vertical array data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[18]  B. Carlson Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays , 1988 .

[19]  R. Rajagopal,et al.  Signal subspace beamforming in the presence of coherent interferences and unknown correlated noise fields , 1997, Signal Process..