Can Observational Practice Facilitate Error Recognition and Movement Production?

Abstract Two experiments are reported that examined the usefulness of observational learning for acquiring both error detection and movement production capabilities. In both experiments, individuals were assigned to a no-practice, physical-practice, or observational practice condition. Those assigned to a physical-practice condition acted as models for those assigned as observers. In both experiments, models were administered a random practice of three serial key-press tasks that had the same spatial pattern and same relative timing requirement but differed in the overall time goal. During the retention test, individuals provided estimates of their overall time after each trial. Data from these experiments revealed that error detection and overall time specification were similar following observation and physical practice. However, data from Experiment 2 indicated that physical practice offered an advantage beyond that afforded via observation, with regard to acquiring the appropriate relative time pattern. These data are discussed with respect to the role of observation for learning movement recognition and production processes.

[1]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades Learning , 1990 .

[2]  M. Weiss,et al.  Modeling Considerations in Motor Skill Acquisition and Performance: An Integrated, Approach , 1989, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[3]  H Zelaznik,et al.  Feedback in response recognition and production. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[5]  G Wulf,et al.  Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  A Bandura,et al.  Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Interpolated Activities During the Knowledge-of-Results Delay and Post-Knowledge-of-Results Interval: Effects on Performance and Learning , 1990 .

[8]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[9]  G Wulf,et al.  Optimizing Generalized Motor Program and Parameter Learning , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  K M Newell,et al.  On the structure of motor recognition memory. , 1978, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  A Bandura,et al.  Translating cognition into action: the role of visual guidance in observational learning. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  A Bandura,et al.  Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  K M Newell,et al.  Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  C H Shea,et al.  Generalized Motor Program (GMP) Learning: Effects of Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results and Practice Variability. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  J. A. Adams Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance , 1986 .

[18]  G Wulf,et al.  Physical and Observational Practice Afford Unique Learning Opportunities , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  J C Hogan,et al.  The role of verbal estimates of movement error in ballistic skill acquisition. , 1978, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  A Bandura,et al.  The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: making the unobservable observable. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  Q Lai,et al.  Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  R A Washburn,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity in Older Adults , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[23]  D E Sherwood,et al.  The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[24]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The 1984 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: The Search for Invariance in Skilled Movement Behavior , 1985 .