Development of an integrated electronic platform for patient self-report and management of adverse events during cancer treatment

Background Significant adverse events (AE) during cancer therapy disrupt treatment and escalate to emergency admissions. Approaches to improve the timeliness and accuracy of AE reporting may improve safety and reduce health service costs. Reporting AE via patient reported outcomes (PROs), can improve clinician-patient communication and making data available to clinicians in 'real-time' using electronic PROs (ePROs) could potentially transform clinical practice by providing easily accessible records to guide treatment decisions. This manuscript describes the development of eRAPID (electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice) is a National Institute for Health Research-funded programme, a system for patients to self-report and manage AE online during and after cancer treatment. Materials and methods A multidisciplinary team of IT experts, staff and patients developed using agile principles a secure web application interface (QStore) between an existing online questionnaire builder (QTool) displaying real-time ePRO data to clinicians in the electronic patient record at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Hierarchical algorithms were developed corresponding to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading using the QTool question dependency function. Patient advocates (N = 9), patients (N = 13), and staff (N = 19) usability tested the system reporting combinations of AE. Results The eRAPID system allows patients to report AE from home on PC, tablet or any web enabled device securely during treatment. The system generates immediate self-management advice for low or moderate AE and for severe AE advice to contact the hospital immediately. Clinicians can view patient AE data in the electronic patient record and receive email notifications when patients report severe AE. Conclusions Evaluation of the system in a randomised controlled trial in breast, gynaecological and colorectal cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy is currently underway. To adapt eRAPID for different treatment groups, pilot studies are being undertaken with patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy and upper gastrointestinal surgery. ISRCTN88520246.

[1]  M. Conner,et al.  Electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID): a randomised controlled trial in systemic cancer treatment , 2017, BMC Cancer.

[2]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. Velikova,et al.  Asking the right questions to get the right answers: using cognitive interviews to review the acceptability, comprehension and clinical meaningfulness of patient self-report adverse event items in oncology patients , 2016, Acta oncologica.

[4]  G. Velikova,et al.  An audit of acute oncology services: patient experiences of admission procedures and staff utilisation of a new telephone triage system , 2016, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[5]  C. Snyder,et al.  PRO-cision Medicine: Personalizing Patient Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Giesinger,et al.  Patients' Preferences Regarding The Setting Of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Assessments. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  Gabriele Meyer,et al.  Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2) , 2015, Trials.

[8]  Fangxin Hong,et al.  The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[9]  David Forman,et al.  Integrating Patient Reported Outcomes With Clinical Cancer Registry Data: A Feasibility Study of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) System , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  H. Draper,et al.  Patient-reported outcome alerts: ethical and logistical considerations in clinical trials. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[11]  Nick Black,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare , 2013, BMJ.

[12]  Barbara Weber,et al.  The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[13]  Monika Alise Johansen,et al.  Electronic Symptom Reporting Between Patient and Provider for Improved Health Care Service Quality: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Part 1: State of the Art , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Scott W. Ambler,et al.  Disciplined Agile Delivery: A Practitioner's Guide to Agile Software Delivery in the Enterprise , 2012 .

[15]  E. Basch,et al.  Use of patient-reported outcomes to improve the predictive accuracy of clinician-reported adverse events. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  Mike Leahy,et al.  Development of an advanced database for clinical trials integrated with an electronic patient record system , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[17]  Roxanne Jensen,et al.  PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  N. Kearney,et al.  Patients' perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity. , 2009, European journal of cancer care.

[19]  S. Sarwar,et al.  National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death , 2007 .

[20]  Nandita Mitra,et al.  Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Michelle L. Rogers,et al.  Usability Testing and the Relation of Clinical Information Systems to Patient Safety , 2005 .

[22]  Galina Velikova,et al.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.