Surgically induced hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory changes in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a comparison with abdominal hysterectomy

Objective  To assess and compare surgically induced hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory changes during laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Setting  Baby Friendly Hospital, Kladno, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Prague. Design  77 women, with no major medical disorder but requiring hysterectomy for benign diseases, were prospectively assigned to undergo laparoscopic (n = 59) or abdominal hysterectomy (n = 18). Surgical characteristics, hospital stay and complications were analysed. Blood samples for assay of markers of tissue trauma (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), creatine kinase, cortisol, white blood cell count (WBC) and cystatin C) were taken preoperatively and on the first and third postoperative day. Results  There were no differences between the two groups with regard to demographic characterics, but the mean uterine weight was 220 g in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group vs. 540 g in the abdominal hysterectomy group, (P < 0.0001). The median (interquartile range) operating time was 80 min (70–90 min) in the laparoscopic group and 105 min (80–120 min) in the abdominal group (P < 0.05). For the laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy groups, respectively, the estimated blood loss was 100 ml (95–200 ml) and 300 ml (250–2000 ml) (P < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was 4 days (3–4 days) and 8 days (7–10 days) (P < 0.0001), and the decline in the haemoglobin level was 0.9 and 2.45 g dl−1 on the third postoperative day (P < 0.001). Preoperative levels of biochemical markers were low in both groups. The rates of major and moderate complications were found to be low in the groups under comparison. One woman with a ureteral injury was excluded from the laparoscopic group for purposes of statistical analysis. There were significant increases in the serum concentrations of cortisol, CRP, IL-6, creatine kinase and WBC after surgery in both groups. The laparoscopic group demonstrated a less intense stress response in terms of IL-6 (P < 0.0001), CRP (P < 0.0001), creatine kinase (P < 0.001), cortisol (P < 0.05) and WBC (P < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of cystatin-C decreased insignificantly during the first postoperative day. Conclusion  Compared with abdominal hysterectomy in women with pelvic disorders, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a less intense hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory reponse and a more favourable clinical outcome.

[1]  G. Hall,et al.  Osteocalcin and the hormonal, inflammatory and metabolic response to major orthopaedic surgery. , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[2]  Z. Holub,et al.  Inflammatory response and tissue trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of electrosurgery and harmonic scalpel. , 2002, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[3]  D. Watson,et al.  Effect of laparoscopy on immune function , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  T. Falcone Laparoscopic compared to abdominal hysterectomy resulted in better clinical outcome and less tissue trauma , 2001 .

[5]  Z. Holub,et al.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy: Randomized study of harmonic scalpel and electrosurgery , 2000 .

[6]  J. Toivonen,et al.  Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: , 2000 .

[7]  J. Toivonen,et al.  Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Holub,et al.  Assessment of tissue damage associated with laparoscopic and conventional hysterectomies , 1998 .

[9]  M S Rogers,et al.  Metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  R. Garry 8 Comparison of hysterectomy techniques and cost-benefit analysis , 1997 .

[11]  H. Leweling,et al.  Surgical trauma and metabolic changes induced by surgical laparoscopy versus laparotomy , 1997 .

[12]  E. Steinberg,et al.  Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Olsson,et al.  Tissue Trauma after Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy Measuring Inflammatory Response , 1996, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[14]  A. Bengtsson,et al.  Evaluation of tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: measurements of neutrophil activation and release of interleukin-6, cortisol, and C-reactive protein. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  J. Neilson,et al.  Laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Platelet activation in major surgical stress: influence of combined epidural and general anaesthesia , 1994, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  T. Ishiko,et al.  Elevation of circulating interleukin 6 after surgery: factors influencing the serum level. , 1994, Cytokine.

[18]  R. Hunter,et al.  Can laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy safely replace abdominal hysterectomy? , 1993 .

[19]  A. Ogata,et al.  Interleukin-6 as a new indicator of inflammatory status: detection of serum levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein after surgery. , 1992, Surgery.

[20]  W. Fraser,et al.  Response of serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity. , 1990, Clinical science.

[21]  H. Reich,et al.  Laparoscopic Treatment of Ruptured Interstitial Pregnancy , 1990 .

[22]  H. Verbrugh,et al.  Neutrophil function, serum opsonic activity, and delayed hypersensitivity in surgical patients. , 1982, Surgery.