An investigation of the PEM fuel cells performance with partially restricted cathode flow channels and metal foam as a flow distributor

In the present work, the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells is studied for three cases; A fuel cell with two parallel flow channels (model A), locally baffle restricted flow channels (model B), and metal foam as a flow distributor (model C). The fully coupled thermal-electrochemical equations are numerically solved in three dimensions, based on the macroscopic, single-domain, and finite-volume approaches. While having no significant effect on temperature distribution, the existence of baffles inside flow channels results in more oxygen penetration into gas diffusion and catalyst layers at the cathode side of the cell. This improves the chemical reaction rate, current density and cell performance. Using metal foam increases oxygen concentration and current density at the cathode catalyst surface, and improves the uniformity of their distributions. Furthermore, a more uniform temperature distribution is achieved, when compared with the other cases. For the considered dimensions, it is observed that decreasing the flow channel depth results to an increase in current density and also in pressure drop along channels (models A and C). Moreover, increasing metal foam porosity can increase the current density value and decrease pressure drop in model C, while it has nearly no effects on temperature distribution.

[1]  Abdul-Ghani Olabi,et al.  Design of experiment study of the parameters that affect performance of three flow plate configurations of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2010 .

[2]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of baffle-blocked flow channel on reactant transport and cell performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2005 .

[3]  Chung-Jen Tseng,et al.  Effects of flow field design on the performance of a PEM fuel cell with metal foam as the flow distributor , 2012 .

[4]  Keith Scott,et al.  A two-phase flow and non-isothermal agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell , 2014 .

[5]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Transient analysis of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2005 .

[6]  E. Afshari,et al.  Numerical predictions of performance of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell with baffle(s)-blocked flow field designs , 2014 .

[7]  Chung-Jen Tseng,et al.  A PEM fuel cell with metal foam as flow distributor , 2012 .

[8]  Seyed Ali Jazayeri,et al.  Effects of the cell thermal behavior and water phase change on a proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance , 2010 .

[9]  Alfredo Iranzo,et al.  Investigation of the liquid water distributions in a 50 cm2 PEM fuel cell: Effects of reactants relative humidity, current density, and cathode stoichiometry , 2015 .

[10]  Hyunchul Ju,et al.  A single-phase, non-isothermal model for PEM fuel cells , 2005 .

[11]  Donald A. Nield,et al.  Two Types of Nonlinear Pressure-Drop Versus Flow-Rate Relation Observed for Saturated Porous Media , 1997 .

[12]  Abdul-Ghani Olabi,et al.  Design and development of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using open pore cellular foam as flow plate material , 2014 .

[13]  Yun Wang Porous-Media Flow Fields for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells I. Low Humidity Operation , 2009 .

[14]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Analysis of reactant gas transport in a PEM fuel cell with partially blocked fuel flow channels , 2005 .

[15]  Yiannis Ventikos,et al.  Simulations of flow through open cell metal foams using an idealized periodic cell structure , 2003 .

[16]  James Carton,et al.  Design & development of innovative proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2011 .

[17]  Jack Legrand,et al.  Pressure drop prediction for flow through high porosity metallic foams , 1994 .

[18]  C. Hochenauer,et al.  Water droplet accumulation and motion in PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cell mini-channels , 2012 .

[19]  M. De Paepe,et al.  A Discussion on the Interpretation of the Darcy Equation in Case of Open-Cell Metal Foam Based on Numerical Simulations , 2016, Materials.

[20]  I. Taymaz,et al.  Numerical study of assembly pressure effect on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2010 .

[21]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Mathematical modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2001 .

[22]  Edson A. Ticianelli,et al.  Methods to Advance Technology of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells , 1988 .

[23]  A. Olabi,et al.  Representative model and flow characteristics of open pore cellular foam and potential use in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2015 .

[24]  I. Khazaee,et al.  Effect of humidity content and direction of the flow of reactant gases on water management in the 4-serpentine and 1-serpentine flow channel in a PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell , 2016 .

[25]  S. Jazayeri,et al.  Effect of water phase change on temperature distribution in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2010 .

[26]  J. L. Lage,et al.  Darcy’s Experiments and the Deviation to Nonlinear Flow Regime , 2000 .

[27]  C. Siegel Review of computational heat and mass transfer modeling in polymer-electrolyte-membrane (PEM) fuel cells , 2008 .

[28]  Wei Yuan,et al.  Porous metal materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells – A review , 2012 .

[29]  Burhan Ozmat,et al.  Thermal Applications of Open-Cell Metal Foams , 2004 .

[30]  Yun Wang,et al.  Porous-Media Flow Fields for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells II. Analysis of Channel Two-Phase Flow , 2009 .

[31]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Novel serpentine-baffle flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2007 .

[32]  J. P. Du Plessis,et al.  Pressure drop modelling in cellular metallic foams , 2002 .

[33]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Computational modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells: Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .

[34]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Metal foams as flow field and gas diffusion layer in direct methanol fuel cells , 2007 .

[35]  Biao Zhou,et al.  Water behavior in serpentine micro-channel for proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathode , 2005 .

[36]  Ramana G. Reddy,et al.  Materials and design development for bipolar/end plates in fuel cells , 2004 .

[37]  A. Olabi,et al.  Three-dimensional proton exchange membrane fuel cell model: Comparison of double channel and open pore cellular foam flow plates , 2017 .

[38]  Zhenming Yang,et al.  Numerical investigation on the flow characteristics and permeability of three-dimensional reticulated foam materials , 2008 .

[39]  Ramana G. Reddy,et al.  Modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with metal foam in the flow-field of the bipolar/end plates , 2003 .