Genotype x environment interactions in pig breeding programmes

Merks, J.W.M., 1986. Genotype X environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. I. Central test. Livest. Prod. Sei, 14: 365—381. In this first paper of a series, Dutch central test results are examined for genotype X environment interaction (G X E) and the data are further used to estimate genetic correlations between the various evaluations of growth and carcass quality, as used in the distinct environments of the breeding programme. G X E in pig breeding programmes is outlined as genotypes expressing different phenotypes in the distinct levels of the breeding programme or even in different environments within a level (e.g. herds). In most studies on G X E, the expectation of genetic correlation between similar traits measured in different environments has been taken to be one. Estimated correlations between similar traits measured on central tested pigs in this study indicate however, that expectations should be smaller, especially for carcass characteristics. Genetic correlations of carcass backfat thickness (CB) with ultrasonic backfat thickness (UB), normally used in on-farm tests, were 0.61 and 0.57 for Dutch Landrace (NL) and Dutch Yorkshire (GY), respectively. Correlations of UB with backfat class, as used in commercial fattening, were 0.25 and 0.42. Genetic correlations of ham + loin % with type class were 0.60 and 0.94. In future analyses of G X E these differences in genetic background of the traits should be taken into account. Genotype X batch and genotype X sex interactions were investigated for daily gain and feed conversion ratio. No significant interactions were found. However, for daily gain between arriving at the station and the end of the test, as well as for weight for age at the end of the test, genotype X batch interaction was significant (P < 0.05). The possible causes of these interactions are discussed. For slaughter characteristics genotype X month interactions were not of significance.

[1]  N. Standal Studies on Breeding and Selection Schemes in Pigs: VI. Correlation between Breeding Values estimated from Station Test and On-Farm-Test Data , 1977 .

[2]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Estimation of Genetic Trends and Correlations for Jersey Cattle , 1983 .

[3]  E. D. Eikje Studies on Sheep Production Records , 1974 .

[4]  Yukio Yamada Genotype by Environment Interaction and Genetic Correlation of the same Trait under Different Environments , 1962 .

[5]  S. R. Searle Linear Models , 1971 .

[6]  G. Ross,et al.  Genetic parameters of British Landrace bacon pigs , 1965 .

[7]  T. Henningsson Studies on Performance Testing for Growth Rate of Dual Purpose Bulls , 1986 .

[8]  H. Langholz Das züchterische Hilfsmittel der stationären Nachkommenprüfung beim Schwein , 1965 .

[9]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Heterogeneity of variance amongst herds for milk production , 1986 .

[10]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Computing solutions to mixed model equations. , 1986 .

[11]  D. D. Kress,et al.  Sire × Region of United States and Herd Interactions for Calving Ease and Birth Weight , 1982 .

[12]  J. Merks,et al.  Genotype environment interaction in pig breeding programmes: Methods of estimation and relevance of the estimates , 1985 .

[13]  R. Hanset,et al.  Les paramètres génétiques des caractères d'engraissement et de carcasse chez le porc Landrace Belge , 1973, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[14]  B. Kennedy Genetic evaluation of growth rate and backfat of pigs by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. , 1982 .

[15]  N. Standal Studies on Breeding and Selection Schemes in Pigs , 1968 .

[16]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Genetic Evaluation of Swine for Growth Rate and Backfat Thickness1 , 1985 .

[17]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[18]  L. Dempfle Comparison of several sire evaluation methods in dairy cattle breeding , 1977, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[19]  R. Kempson,et al.  A comparison of ‘on-farm’ and station testing in pigs , 1977 .

[20]  D. Falconer The Problem of Environment and Selection , 1952, The American Naturalist.

[21]  E. Scheinberg 220. Note: The Sampling Variance of the Correlation Coefficients Estimated in Genetic Experiments , 1966 .

[22]  J. Foulley,et al.  A note on criteria of coherence for the parameters used to construct a selection index , 1986 .

[23]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Improvement by Means of Selection , 1951 .

[24]  T. Vestergaard,et al.  Estimation of Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters for Selection Index Evaluation in the Danish Pig Breeding Program , 1984 .

[25]  J. Blum Populationsanalyse der schweizerischen Schweinerassen , 1983 .

[26]  G. Dickerson Implications of genetic-environmental interaction in animal breeding , 1962 .

[27]  J. Merks,et al.  Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. VI. Genetic relations between performances in central test, on-farm test and commercial fattening , 1989 .

[28]  C. R. Henderson,et al.  Analysis of Deviations of Dairy Records from Different Contemporary Averages , 1961 .

[29]  Daniel Sorensen,et al.  Estimation of Genetic Variances from Unselected and Selected Populations , 1984 .

[30]  J. Lalouel,et al.  Path analysis of family resemblance and gene-environment interaction , 1984 .