Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy

Construction of population atlases is a key issue in medical image analysis, and particularly in brain mapping. Large sets of images are mapped into a common coordinate system to study intra-population variability and inter-population differences, to provide voxel-wise mapping of functional sites, and help tissue and object segmentation via registration of anatomical labels. Common techniques often include the choice of a template image, which inherently introduces a bias. This paper describes a new method for unbiased construction of atlases in the large deformation diffeomorphic setting. A child neuroimaging autism study serves as a driving application. There is lack of normative data that explains average brain shape and variability at this early stage of development. We present work in progress toward constructing an unbiased MRI atlas of 2 years of children and the building of a probabilistic atlas of anatomical structures, here the caudate nucleus. Further, we demonstrate the segmentation of new subjects via atlas mapping. Validation of the methodology is performed by comparing the deformed probabilistic atlas with existing manual segmentations.

[1]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  U. Grenander,et al.  Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  Variational problems on ows of di eomorphisms for image matching , 1998 .

[4]  D. Kendall SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .

[5]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Elastically Deforming 3D Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  G. Christensen,et al.  Large Deformation Fluid Diffeomorphisms for Landmark and Image Matching , 1999 .

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Consistent groupwise non-rigid registration for atlas construction , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[8]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Level-set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[9]  H. Jeremy Bockholt,et al.  Subcortical, cerebellar, and magnetic resonance based consistent brain image registration , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Extraction and Application of Expert Priors to Combine Multiple Segmentations of Human Brain Tissue , 2003, MICCAI.

[11]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Group Actions, Homeomorphisms, and Matching: A General Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Statistics of shape via principal geodesic analysis on Lie groups , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Karl Heinz Höhne,et al.  A volume-based anatomical atlas , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Valmet: A New Validation Tool for Assessing and Improving 3D Object Segmentation , 2001, MICCAI.

[18]  William M. Wells,et al.  Validation of Image Segmentation and Expert Quality with an Expectation-Maximization Algorithm , 2002, MICCAI.

[19]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Gaussian Distributions on Lie Groups and Their Application to Statistical Shape Analysis , 2003, IPMI.

[21]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. , 1998 .

[22]  Sarang C. Joshi,et al.  High-Dimensional Multi-modal Image Registration , 2003, WBIR.

[23]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Detection, visualization and animation of abnormal anatomic structure with a deformable probabilistic brain atlas based on random vector field transformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[24]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Large Deformation Inverse Consistent Elastic Image Registration , 2003, IPMI.

[25]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  The Institute For Research In Cognitive Science Elastically Deforming a Three-Dimensional Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images , 1993 .

[26]  Peter Lorenzen,et al.  Structural and radiometric asymmetry in brain images , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A framework for computational anatomy , 2002 .

[28]  K. Zou,et al.  Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[29]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Expectation Maximization Strategies for Multi-atlas Multi-label Segmentation , 2003, IPMI.

[30]  J. Gee,et al.  Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  M. Fréchet Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancié , 1948 .

[33]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .

[34]  L. Younes,et al.  On the metrics and euler-lagrange equations of computational anatomy. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.