Uncertainty Assessment: Reservoir Inflow Forecasting with Ensemble Precipitation Forecasts and HEC-HMS

During an extreme event, having accurate inflow forecasting with enough lead time helps reservoir operators decrease the impact of floods downstream. Furthermore, being able to efficiently operate reservoirs could help maximize flood protection while saving water for drier times of the year. This study combines ensemble quantitative precipitation forecasts and a hydrological model to provide a 3-day reservoir inflow in the Shihmen Reservoir, Taiwan. A total of six historical typhoons were used for model calibration, validation, and application. An understanding of cascaded uncertainties from the numerical weather model through the hydrological model is necessary for a better use for forecasting. This study thus conducted an assessment of forecast uncertainty on magnitude and timing of peak and cumulative inflows. It found that using the ensemble-mean had less uncertainty than randomly selecting individual member. The inflow forecasts with shorter length of cumulative time had a higher uncertainty. The results showed that using the ensemble precipitation forecasts with the hydrological model would have the advantage of extra lead time and serve as a valuable reference for operating reservoirs.

[1]  J. Knighton,et al.  Development of probability distributions for urban hydrologic model parameters and a Monte Carlo analysis of model sensitivity , 2014 .

[2]  H. Ouyang,et al.  Anthropogenic effects and climate change threats on the flood diversion of Erchung Floodway in Tanshui River, northern Taiwan , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[3]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Rainfall Uncertainty in Flood Forecasting: Belgian Case Study of Rivierbeek , 2014 .

[4]  Cheng-Hsin Chen,et al.  Assessment of sewer flooding model based on ensemble quantitative precipitation forecast , 2013 .

[5]  Gwo-Fong Lin,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of typhoon rainfall and floods over a mountainous watershed in Taiwan , 2013 .

[6]  Almoutaz A. El Hassan,et al.  Performance of a conceptual and physically based model in simulating the response of a semi‐urbanized watershed in San Antonio, Texas , 2013 .

[7]  D. Halwatura,et al.  Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  M. Valipour,et al.  Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir , 2013 .

[9]  Tsung-Yu Lee,et al.  Linking typhoon tracks and spatial rainfall patterns for improving flood lead time predictions over a mesoscale mountainous watershed , 2012 .

[10]  J. Vaze,et al.  Estimating the Relative Uncertainties Sourced from GCMs and Hydrological Models in Modeling Climate Change Impact on Runoff , 2012 .

[11]  Renaud Hostache,et al.  Propagation of uncertainties in coupled hydro-meteorological forecasting systems: a stochastic approach for the assessment of the total predictive uncertainty. , 2011 .

[12]  U. Germann,et al.  Superposition of three sources of uncertainties in operational flood forecasting chains , 2011 .

[13]  Peter Krahe,et al.  The COST 731 Action : a review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems , 2011 .

[14]  N. Arnell.  Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and hydrological response in UK catchments , 2010 .

[15]  Zhiting Zhang,et al.  Improvement and optimization of Thiessen polygon method boundary treatment program , 2009, 2009 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics.

[16]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. , 2009 .

[17]  K. Chau,et al.  Predicting monthly streamflow using data‐driven models coupled with data‐preprocessing techniques , 2009 .

[18]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[19]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[20]  R. Wilby,et al.  A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low‐flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK , 2006 .

[21]  C. Willmott,et al.  Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance , 2005 .

[22]  Ming-Jen Yang,et al.  Simulating Typhoon Floods with Gauge Data and Mesoscale-Modeled Rainfall in a Mountainous Watershed , 2005 .

[23]  Chuntian Cheng,et al.  Long-Term Prediction of Discharges in Manwan Reservoir Using Artificial Neural Network Models , 2005, ISNN.

[24]  T. Palmer.  A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non‐local stochastic‐dynamic parametrization in weather and climate prediction models , 2001 .

[25]  A. Feldman,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling System , 1996 .

[26]  E. Lorenz,et al.  The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion , 1969 .