Optimized fire protection of cultural heritage structures based on the analytic hierarchy process

Abstract Fire safety constitutes a significant part of engineering design practice that frequently lead designers to face critical decision-making type of questions. Especially in the case of fire protection of cultural heritage structures, the challenges that engineers confront are sometimes very difficult to deal with. Conventional prescriptive-based fire protection codes cannot be implemented for the protection of such structural systems; on the other hand, performance-based design (PBD) procedures can provide reliable solutions for this type of structures. Fire safety upgrading of historic structures can be expressed as multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems. In this context, we propose a model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that is able to assess the overall fire safety level of a structure in terms of the fire protection measures implemented. Moreover, a generic selection and resource allocation (S&RA) model is applied that in conjunction with the proposed AHP model leads to optimized solutions. In this study, the implementation of the proposed optimized fire protection upgrade framework along with its advantages is presented for the case of the Mount Athos monastery of Simonos Petra and results are discussed.

[1]  Liu Bo-yun.  DS-AHP Optimization Model and Its Application on Fire Protection System , 2009 .

[2]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[3]  Qiyuan Xie,et al.  Improving analytic hierarchy process applied to fire risk analysis of public building , 2009 .

[4]  Marilyn E. Kaplan,et al.  Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings , 2001 .

[5]  T. Saaty.  An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[6]  Paul Stollard.  The development of a points scheme to assess fire safety in hospitals , 1984 .

[7]  R. Macchiaroli,et al.  Use of analytic hierarchy process and fire dynamics simulator to assess the fire protection systems in a tunnel on fire , 2010 .

[8]  John M. Watts,et al.  Fire Safety Code for Historic Structures , 2002 .

[9]  E. Marchant.  Fire safety engineering: a quantified analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Antonin Ponsich,et al.  Differential Evolution performances for the solution of mixed-integer constrained process engineering problems , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Krishna Prasad Vadrevu,et al.  Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis—a case study , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[12]  Chi-Jan Huang,et al.  Study on Fire Hazard Factors of Apartment Building Using Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2009 .

[13]  Nikos D. Lagaros,et al.  A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform , 2014 .

[14]  Jr. John M. Watts.  Fire Protection Performance Evaluation for Historic Buildings , 2001 .

[15]  Kanhua Yu.  Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Fire Safety Risk of Historic Buildings Based on Fuzzy Mathematics , 2013 .

[16]  Yang-Wei Shao,et al.  Improvement of the Fire Control and Fire Safety for Old Buildings Management , 2011 .

[17]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  P. N. Suganthan,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[19]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[20]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[21]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[22]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition , 2001, Oper. Res..