Motor unit number estimation: Sample size considerations

A computer model of the motor unit number estimation procedure was developed to evaluate the sampling error associated with estimates of the number of motor units in muscles. Two different distributions were used to model the motor unit amplitude distribution and were chosen in such a manner that they qualitatively matched the distributions observed under both normal and neurogenic conditions. As expected, the results indicated that estimation error decreases as a function of sample size. However, the relationship between these two variables was nonlinear in the sense that successive increases in sample size lead to progressively smaller decreases in estimation error. The results also indicated that the shape of the motor unit amplitude distribution plays an important role. Specifically, estimates obtained using the distribution modeling normal muscle were generally higher than the actual number of motor units in the muscle, which was not the case for the distribution modeling neurogenic muscle. In addition, the neurogenic distribution was associated with much smaller estimation error, suggesting that motor unit number estimation is well suited to the analysis of neurogenic disease processes. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Mb Alan J. McComas Dr.,et al.  Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status. , 1991 .

[2]  M. Bromberg,et al.  Sources of error in the spike‐triggered averaging method of motor unit number estimation (MUNE) , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  M. Bromberg Motor unit estimation: Reproducibility of the spike‐triggered averaging technique in normal and ALS subjects , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  A. McComas,et al.  Further motor unit studies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  W. Brown,et al.  Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps‐brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  G. Wieneke,et al.  Estimation of the number of motor units based on macro-EMG. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  J. Albers,et al.  The natural history of a “benign” rib lesion in a patient with a demyelinating polyneuropathy and an unusual variant of poems syndrome , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  A. McComas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of Duchenne dystrophy , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  W. Brown,et al.  The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  A. McComas,et al.  Motor unit estimation: Anxieties and achievements , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  M. Bromberg,et al.  Motor unit number estimation, isometric strength, and electromyographic measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  R B Stein,et al.  The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  C A Laszlo,et al.  A review of techniques employed to estimate the number of motor units in a muscle , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  B. Shahani,et al.  A new approach to motor unit estimation with surface EMG triggered averaging technique , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  A. McComas,et al.  Multiple muscle analysis of motor units in muscular dystrophy. , 1974, Archives of neurology.

[17]  J F Yang,et al.  Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[18]  William F. Brown,et al.  The Physiological and Technical Basis of Electromyography , 1985 .

[19]  T J Doherty,et al.  Determinants of mean motor unit size: Impact on estimates of motor unit number , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  Cecil Hershler,et al.  Motor unit estimates obtained using the new “MUESA” method , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  M J Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  R. Stein,et al.  The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Physiological properties of single thenar motor units in the F‐response of younger and older adults , 1994, Muscle & nerve.