ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION INCLUDING NONLINEAR MECHANICS

It is common practice to base both, topology optimization as well as a subsequent shape optimization, on linear elastic structural response. But the value of optimization results in the design of structures strongly depends on the relevance of the underlying mechanical model. For example a key question is how good the level of the chosen kinematic relation or the underlying material model are able to represent the real behavior of the structure. Furthermore the quality of the numerical methods in order to determine the structural response and its sensitivity plays an important role. The more the mechanical model is simplified by assumptions, e.g. neglecting nonlinear effects or by approximating the in general 3D structural layout and stress state by 1D or 2D models, the less meaningful and the more sensitive the optimization results may be. To obtain a realistic design by structural optimization it may be essential to base the optimization on a more realistic physical behavior, e.g. to consider geometrically and materially non- linearities. The present study addresses these aspects and extends the formulation into the nonlinear structural regime. This may include either large deformations and stability phenomena or material nonlinearities. Moreover in view of gradient solution methods, the sensitivity analysis has to be adapted to these extended problems. Depending on the kind of the mechanical problem different methods for the sensitivity analysis are applied. For path-dependent problems, like elastoplasticity, a variational approach turns out to be suitable while for problems with pure geometrically nonlinear behavior a discrete approach is favorable. The present optimization procedures are demonstrated by examples showing rather the principle features of the enhancements then real practical design problems.

[1]  Creto Augusto Vidal,et al.  The consistent tangent operator for design sensitivity analysis of history-dependent response , 1991 .

[2]  H. P. Mlejnek,et al.  Some aspects of the genesis of structures , 1992 .

[3]  Gabriel Bugeda,et al.  Shape sensitivity analysis for structural problems with non‐linear material behaviour , 1999 .

[4]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Structural design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear response , 1985 .

[5]  E. Oñate,et al.  Structural shape sensitivity analysis for nonlinear material models with strain softening , 1999 .

[6]  M. Zhou,et al.  Generalized shape optimization without homogenization , 1992 .

[7]  R. Kohn,et al.  Optimal design and relaxation of variational problems, III , 1986 .

[8]  Kai-Uwe Bletzinger Shape optimization by homotopy methods with special application to membrane structures , 1996 .

[9]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  Topology optimization of geometrically nonlinear structures and compliant mechanisms , 1998 .

[10]  M. Imam Three‐dimensional shape optimization , 1982 .

[11]  C. Swan,et al.  VOIGT-REUSS TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION FOR STRUCTURES WITH NONLINEAR MATERIAL BEHAVIORS , 1997 .

[12]  Lucien A. Schmit,et al.  An integrated approach to the synthesis of geometrically non‐linear structures , 1988 .

[13]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Buckling and imperfection sensitivity in the optimization of shell structures , 1995 .

[14]  M. Kleiber,et al.  Shape and non-shape structural sensitivity analysis for problems with any material and kinematic non-linearity , 1993 .

[15]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, And Material , 1995 .

[16]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis of non‐linear structural systems part I: Theory , 1987 .

[17]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  APPLICATION OF TOPOLOGICAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES TO STRUCTURAL CRASHWORTHINESS , 1996 .

[18]  R. Haber,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis for rate-independent elastoplasticity , 1993 .

[19]  Analysis and Design of Elastic/Softening Truss Structures Based on a Mixed-Form Extremum Principle , 1993 .

[20]  E. Ramm,et al.  Adaptive topology optimization of elastoplastic structures , 1998 .

[21]  K. Wiechmann,et al.  Remarks on variational design sensitivity analysis of structures with large elasto-plastic deformations , 1998 .

[22]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Optimization of 2-D structures subjected to nonlinear deformations using the homogenization method , 1999 .

[23]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Optimization of a frame structure subjected to a plastic deformation , 1995 .

[24]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Layout Optimization of Structures , 1995 .

[25]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  Optimization of geometrically nonlinear thin-walled structures using the multipoint approximation method , 1995 .

[26]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology design of structures , 1993 .

[27]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Nonlinear structural design sensivitity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory , 1990 .

[28]  Duong Hien Tran,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computations , 1997 .

[29]  E. Ramm,et al.  Adaptive topology optimization , 1995 .

[30]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for non‐linear constrained elastostatic systems , 1992 .

[31]  Reinhold Steinhauser,et al.  Application of vector performance optimization to a robust control loop design for a fighter aircraft , 1983 .

[32]  Makoto Ohsaki,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis of elastoplastic structures , 1994 .

[33]  E. Ramm,et al.  Topology and shape optimization for elastoplastic structural response , 2001 .