Rigor in Qualitative Supply Chain Management Research: Lessons from Applying Repertory Grid Technique

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to share the authors' experiences of using the repertory grid technique in two supply chain management studies. The paper aims to demonstrate how the two studies provided insights into how qualitative techniques such as the repertory grid can be made more rigorous than in the past, and how results can be generated that are inaccessible using quantitative methods.Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents two studies undertaken using the repertory grid technique to illustrate its application in supply chain management research.Findings – The paper presents insights into supply chain research that otherwise would not have emerged using traditional methods. Both studies derive a comprehensive list of empirical categories of constructs, many of which have not been identified in the extant literature. Moreover, the technique demonstrates that frequently‐mentioned constructs are not necessarily the most important.Research limitations/implications – The paper demonst...

[1]  Prakash J. Singh,et al.  Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research , 2006 .

[2]  K. Goffin,et al.  Managing suppliers: when fewer can mean more , 1997 .

[3]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[4]  S. Vandermerwe,et al.  Servitization of business : Adding value by adding services , 1988 .

[5]  Tim Baines,et al.  The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges , 2009 .

[6]  Devi Jankowicz,et al.  The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids , 2003 .

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[8]  Brian Dick,et al.  Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies , 2009 .

[9]  R. Gephart Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[10]  Rebecca Zwick,et al.  Another look at interrater agreement. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Jesper Aastrup,et al.  Quality criteria for qualitative inquiries in logistics , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Exploring the Phenomenon of Customers' Desired Value Change in a Business-to-Business Context , 2002 .

[13]  A. Michael Knemeyer,et al.  A qualitative examination of factors affecting reverse logistics systems for end‐of‐life computers , 2002 .

[14]  B. Schneider,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Customer Service Orientations in Manufacturing , 1989 .

[15]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Creating value by delivering integrated solutions , 2005 .

[16]  C. Perry,et al.  Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm , 2000 .

[17]  R. M. Monczka,et al.  Supply Base Strategies to Maximize Supplier Performance , 1993 .

[18]  Paul Close,et al.  Manufacturing change: The role of performance evaluation and control systems , 2000 .

[19]  Amit Sachan,et al.  Review of supply chain management and logistics research , 2005 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Understanding Customer Value and Satisfaction , 1996 .

[22]  Andreas M Riege,et al.  Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a literature review with “hands‐on” applications for each research phase , 2003 .

[23]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Managing the transition from products to services , 2003, International Journal of Service Industry Management.

[24]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[25]  Corinne Grenier,et al.  Validity and Reliability , 2001 .

[26]  R. Brennan,et al.  Buyer/supplier partnering in British industry: The automotive and telecommunications sectors , 1997 .

[27]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[28]  S. New The scope of supply chain management research , 1997 .

[29]  M. Primo,et al.  An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes , 2002 .

[30]  Charles D. Kerns Strengthen your business partnership: a framework and application , 2000 .

[31]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Aligning business and information systems thinking: a cognitive approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  L. Ellram THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 1996 .

[33]  Barbara B. Flynn HAVING IT ALL: RIGOR VERSUS RELEVANCE IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH* , 2008 .

[34]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[35]  R. Wise,et al.  Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing , 1999 .

[36]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  RIGOR VERSUS RELEVANCE: WHY WOULD WE CHOOSE ONLY ONE?* , 2008 .

[37]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  A problem structuring front end for a multiple criteria decision support system , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[38]  Lawrence D. Phillips How Raiffa's RAND memo led to a multi‐criteria computer program , 2006 .

[39]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[40]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[41]  A. Neely Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing , 2008 .

[42]  M. Pratt Fitting Oval Pegs Into Round Holes , 2008 .

[43]  S. Rynes,et al.  What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter? , 2006 .

[44]  M. Tushman,et al.  Crossing Boundaries to Increase Relevance in Organizational Research , 2009 .

[45]  K. Goffin,et al.  Customer support and new product development : An exploratory study , 2001 .

[46]  J. Mentzer,et al.  VALIDITY IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH. , 1997 .

[47]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Progress towards buyer-supplier partnerships: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturing firms , 1996 .

[48]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress , 2011 .

[49]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[50]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[51]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[52]  Glenn A. Bowen Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note , 2008 .

[53]  K. Goffin,et al.  An exploratory study of ‘close’ supplier–manufacturer relationships , 2006 .

[54]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage , 1997 .

[55]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[56]  Wei Yan,et al.  An investigation into sustainable product conceptualization using a design knowledge hierarchy and Hopfield network , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[57]  David M. McCutcheon,et al.  Issues in the choice of supplier alliance partners , 2000 .

[58]  Todd Saxton,et al.  The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics On Alliance Outcomes , 1997 .

[59]  S. Seuring Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management , 2008 .

[60]  Morgan Swink,et al.  The Operations & Supply Management (OSM) Forum—A New Feature , 2008 .

[61]  Dag Näslund Logistics needs qualitative research – especially action research , 2002 .

[62]  David A. Erlandson Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods , 1993 .

[63]  F. Vermeulen On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research , 2005 .

[64]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Empirical Elephants—Why Multiple Methods are Essential to Quality Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management , 2008 .

[65]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[66]  K. Goffin,et al.  Investigating the meaning of supplier-manufacturer partnerships : an exploratory study , 2003 .

[67]  Keith Goffin,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Lessons Learnt, and New Product Development , 2011 .

[68]  B. Looy,et al.  Servitization: or why services management is relevant for manufacturing environments , 2013 .

[69]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .