The efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a five-year followup study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide beyond 2 years in a multinational, open-label extension of 2 phase III double-blind studies. METHODS Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received leflunomide (100 mg/day for 3 days, 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day thereafter) in the 2 phase III studies and who completed 2 years of treatment were offered inclusion in the open-label extension phase and were maintained on the same dosage of leflunomide. The American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 response rates, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed. Safety measures included monitoring of adverse events and laboratory values. RESULTS A total of 214 patients (mean age 57 years) were treated with leflunomide for >2 years; 74.8% of the patients were female. The mean disease duration was 4.1 years (range 0.1-26.6 years), and in 44% of patients, RA was first diagnosed within 2 years of entry into the phase III studies. The mean duration of leflunomide treatment was 4.6 years (range 2.8-5.8 years), and 32% of patients had received no previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates and HAQ scores at 1 year were maintained through year 4 or until the end point. No new types of adverse events were observed, and liver function was normal at baseline and at the end point in the majority of patients. CONCLUSION The improvements in both functional ability and physician-based efficacy measures seen with leflunomide after 1 year were maintained for up to 5 years (maximum treatment duration 5.8 years), demonstrating that the early efficacy of leflunomide in patients with RA is sustained long-term, and that the long-term safety profile of leflunomide is no different from that observed in phase III trials.

[1]  O. Steinbrocker,et al.  Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[2]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[5]  T. Pincus,et al.  Longterm drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in seven rheumatology private practices: II. Second line drugs and prednisone. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[7]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  H. Simmonds,et al.  Importance of Ribonucleotide Availability to Proliferating T-lymphocytes from Healthy Humans , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  J. Fries,et al.  Reduction in long-term disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-based treatment strategies. , 1996, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  Jack Parker Davis,et al.  The immunosuppressive metabolite of leflunomide is a potent inhibitor of human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[11]  F. Wolfe Adverse drug reactions of DMARDs and DC-ARTs in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1997, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[12]  G. Wahl,et al.  Mechanism of action for leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Clinical immunology.

[13]  J. Smolen,et al.  Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  V. Strand,et al.  Treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with placebo and methotrexate. Leflunomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Group. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Dayer Jm,et al.  Leflunomide: mode of action in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  R. Dahl,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[17]  S Gallivan,et al.  Potential bias in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis applied to rheumatology drug studies. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[18]  V. Strand,et al.  Two-year, blinded, randomized, controlled trial of treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with methotrexate. Utilization of Leflunomide in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Investigator Group. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  David Steven Scott,et al.  Treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide: two year follow up of a double blind, placebo controlled trial versus sulfasalazine , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[20]  Pamela F. Jones,et al.  Improved functional ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--longterm treatment with leflunomide versus sulfasalazine. European Leflunomide Study Group. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[21]  R. Rau,et al.  Slowing of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients during long-term treatment with leflunomide or sulfasalazine. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[22]  Michael Weisman,et al.  Concomitant Leflunomide Therapy in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Stable Doses of Methotrexate , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  R. Schleyerbach,et al.  Effects of leflunomide on immune responses and models of inflammation , 2004, Springer Seminars in Immunopathology.