Analytic implementation of the GRAAL model: Application to a R7T7-type glass package in a geological disposal environment

The Glass Reactivity with Allowance for the Alteration Layer Model (GRAAL) was proposed in 2008 to describe borosilicate nuclear glass alteration based on coupling an affinity law with the formation and dissolution of a passivating reactive interface. It is examined here in a simplified form in which only the affinity with respect to silicon is taken into account with a concentration at saturation Csat, and the precipitation of neoformed phases is described by an affine relation for silicon above a precipitation threshold Csat′. This simplified “analytical GRAAL” model is capable of predicting the quantities of altered glass and the silicon and boron concentration variations in analytical or semi-analytical form, and thereby identify the main characteristic quantities of the system. The model was tested against a series of laboratory experiments lasting from a few days to a few years; its sensitivity to the parameter values was examined, and the model was validated with respect to SON68 glass alteration in initially pure water. It was then applied to the alteration of a glass package in a repository over periods of up to a million years, by means of exploratory calculations comprising a sensitivity study of the internal model parameters and extrapolation to the temperatures expected in a geological repository in order to identify the parameters and mechanisms having the greatest impact on the residual alteration rate. Alteration is controlled by the precipitation of neoformed phases in every case. The transient conditions are of very limited duration with respect to either silicon or boron (no more than a 100 years, with less than 0.01% alteration of the package). In the precipitation law used in the model, the residual alteration rate and total package lifetime are determined primarily by two parameters: k′ (the precipitation kinetics) and σ′ (the precipitate surface area per unit volume in the geological barrier). The package lifetime is about 3 × 105 years at 30 °C assuming a reasonable value for σ′ (106 m−1), and would be increased by a factor 3–6 if precipitation in the barrier were disregarded. This cursory description of precipitation will be validated and refined through specific laboratory tests at 50 °C and lower temperatures, coordinated with the development of the “geochemical GRAAL” model and with integral tests in contact with clay and canister corrosion products.

[1]  A. Vinsot,et al.  In situ characterization of the Callovo-Oxfordian pore water composition , 2008 .

[2]  T. Advocat,et al.  Borosilicate Nuclear Waste Glass Alteration Kinetics: Chemical Inhibition and Affinity Control , 1997 .

[3]  S. Gin,et al.  Hydrogen–sodium interdiffusion in borosilicate glasses investigated from first principles , 2006 .

[4]  B. Grambow,et al.  A General Rate Equation for Nuclear Waste Glass Corrosion , 1984 .

[5]  T. Advocat,et al.  Hydrolysis of R7T7 Nuclear Waste Glass in Dilute Media: Mechanisms and Rate as a function of Ph , 1990 .

[6]  S. Gin,et al.  A fractured roman glass block altered for 1800 years in seawater: Analogy with nuclear waste glass in a deep geological repository , 2008 .

[7]  P. Frugier,et al.  Long-term modeling of alteration-transport coupling: Application to a fractured Roman glass , 2010 .

[8]  S. Gin,et al.  SON 68 nuclear glass alteration kinetics between pH 7 and pH 11.5 , 2001 .

[9]  John W. Anthony,et al.  Handbook of mineralogy , 1990 .

[10]  R. Ewing Natural Glasses: Analogues for Radioactive Waste Forms , 1979 .

[11]  Jean-Eric Lartigue,et al.  SON68 nuclear glass dissolution kinetics: Current state of knowledge and basis of the new GRAAL model , 2008 .

[12]  P. Frugier,et al.  Son68 Glass Dissolution Kinetics at High Reaction Progress: Mechanisms Accounting for The Residual Alteration Rate , 2006 .

[13]  J. D. Rimstidt,et al.  The kinetics of silica-water reactions , 1980 .

[14]  Patrick Jollivet,et al.  Insight into silicate-glass corrosion mechanisms. , 2008, Nature materials.

[15]  Bernd Grambow,et al.  First-order dissolution rate law and the role of surface layers in glass performance assessment , 2001 .

[16]  P. Jollivet,et al.  Simulated alteration tests on non-radioactive SON 68 nuclear glass in the presence of corrosion products and environmental materials , 2000 .

[17]  Jean-Eric Lartigue,et al.  Application of the GRAAL model to leaching experiments with SON68 nuclear glass in initially pure water , 2009 .

[18]  J. L. Dussossoy,et al.  Current state of knowledge of nuclear waste glass corrosion mechanisms: the case of R7T7 glass , 1992 .

[19]  O. Bildstein,et al.  Behaviour of silicon released during alteration of nuclear waste glass in compacted clay , 2007 .

[20]  T. Chave,et al.  Solid state diffusion during nuclear glass residual alteration in solution , 2007 .

[21]  Christophe Tournassat,et al.  A robust model for pore-water chemistry of clayrock , 2009 .

[22]  S. Gin,et al.  Role of neoformed phases on the mechanisms controlling the resumption of SON68 glass alteration in alkaline media , 2004 .

[23]  Patrick Jollivet,et al.  Investigation of gel porosity clogging during glass leaching , 2008 .

[24]  Vincent Lagneau,et al.  Influence des processus géochimiques sur le transport en milieu poreux -- application au colmatage de barrières de confinement potentielles dans un stockage en formation géologique , 2000 .

[25]  Tony Chave Etude des mécanismes d'altération par l'eau du verre R7T7 en milieu confiné : compréhension et modélisation de la cinétique résiduelle , 2007 .

[26]  P. Van Iseghem,et al.  Chemical durability of high-level waste glass in repository environment: main conclusions and remaining uncertainties from the GLASTAB and GLAMOR projects , 2006 .