Tuned hair cells for hearing, but tuned basilar membrane for overload protection: Evidence from dolphins, bats, and desert rodents

A cochlear model is presented suggesting that the organ of Corti (OC) and the basilar membrane (BM) are both tuned resonant systems, but have different functions. The OC provides frequency filtering and amplification by means of tuned outer hair cells. The BM provides resonant absorption of excessive vibrational energy as an overload protection for vulnerable elements in the OC. Evidence supporting this model is demonstrated in dolphins, bats, and desert rodents. Specialized auditory capabilities correlate with cochlear deviations, some of them dramatically changing BM compliance. In characteristic regions along the cochlea there are BM thickenings and, on both sides of the OC, hypertrophied supporting cells. Structures of striking similarity have evolved independently across orders or families, revealing multiple events of convergent evolution. In all cases, the locations of deviating structures rule out a BM function in auditory frequency selectivity but support one in resonant absorption. Cochlear microphonics and BM responses demonstrate strongest high-level absorption in the frequency bands most vital for the tested species. The assumed cause is increased internal damping in the enlarged structures during BM motion. Species with intermediate specializations supply further evidence that resonant absorption is universally the genuine function of BM mechanics in mammals, providing complementary high-level protection of low-level sensitivity.

[1]  M. M. Henson The basilar membrane of the bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii. , 1978, The American journal of anatomy.

[2]  H. Heffner,et al.  Hearing in Glires: Domestic rabbit, cotton rat, feral house mouse, and kangaroo rat , 1980 .

[3]  Juan G. Roederer,et al.  Introduction to the physics and psychophysics of music , 1973 .

[4]  O W Henson,et al.  The activity and function of the middle‐ear muscles in echo‐locating bats. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift , 1984, Hearing Research.

[6]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Physiologie des Menschen , 1993, Springer-Lehrbuch.

[8]  A. Pye THE AUDITORY APPARATUS OF THE HETEROMYIDAE (RODENTIA, SCIUROMORPHA). , 1965, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  Basilar membrane tuning properties in the specialised cochlea of the CF-bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 1983, Hearing Research.

[10]  E F Evans,et al.  Cochlear tuning properties: concurrent basilar membrane and single nerve fiber measurements , 1975, Science.

[11]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Effects of loud tones on the inner ear: A combined electrophysiological and ultrastructural study , 1980, Hearing Research.

[12]  A. Starr,et al.  ELECTROMYOGRAPHY OF MIDDLE EAR MUSCLES IN MAN DURING MOTOR ACTIVITIES , 1963, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[13]  A Dancer Experimental look at cochlear mechanics. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  Richard R. Fay,et al.  Structure and Function in Sound Discrimination Among Vertebrates , 1992 .

[15]  D. Webster The ear apparatus of the kangaroo rat, Dipodomys. , 1961, The American journal of anatomy.

[16]  M. Vater Cochlear Physiology and Anatomy in Bats , 1988 .

[17]  S M Khanna,et al.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. , 1982, Science.

[18]  A. J. Hudspeth,et al.  How the ear's works work , 1989, Nature.

[19]  W. Plassmann,et al.  The cochlea in gerbilline rodents. , 1987, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[20]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Stress proteins in biology and medicine , 1991 .

[21]  Darlene R. Ketten,et al.  The Marine Mammal Ear: Specializations for Aquatic Audition and Echolocation , 1992 .

[22]  Barbara Canlon,et al.  Sound-induced motility of isolated cochlear outer hair cells is frequency-specific , 1989, Nature.

[23]  Experimental Look at Cochlear Mechanics: Approche expérimental de la mécanique cochléaire , 1992 .

[24]  G. Manley The Evolution of the Mechanisms of Frequency Selectivity in Vertebrates , 1986 .

[25]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Alteration of basilar membrane responses to sound by acoustic overstimulation , 1993 .

[26]  E. Wever,et al.  Cochlear Structure in the Dolphin, Lagenorhynchus obliquidens. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  S. Khanna,et al.  Mechanical Response of the Outer Hair Cell Region of an Isolated Guinea Pig Cochlea in Vitro , 1989 .

[28]  Guy Rebillard,et al.  Correlation Between the Length of Outer Hair Cells and the Frequency Coding of the Cochlea , 1992 .

[29]  A. Ryan,et al.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  E. Wever,et al.  Cochlea of the dolphin, Tursiops truncatus: the basilar membrane. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  E. Wever,et al.  I The Protective Mechanisms of the Bat's Ear , 1961, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[32]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Alan D. Grinnell,et al.  THE SENSITIVITY OF ECHOLOCATION IN BATS , 1958 .