IEEE 802.11n vs. IEEE 802.15.4: A Study on Communication QoS to Provide Safe FANETs

Flying Ad hoc Network (FANET) is an infrastructure-less multi-hop radio ad hoc network in which Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Ground Control Station (GCS) collaborates to forward data traffic. Compared to the standard Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs), the FANET architecture has some specific features (3D mobility, low UAV density, intermittent network connectivity) that bring challenges to the communication protocol design. Such routing protocol must provide safety by finding an accurate and reliable route between UAVs. This safety can be obtained through the use of agile method during software based routing protocol development (for instance the use of Model Driven Development) by mapping each FANET safety requirement into the routing design process. This process must be completed with a sequential safety validation testing with formal verification tools, standardized simulator (by using real simulation environment) and real-world experiments. In this paper, we considered FANET communication safety by presenting design methodologies and evaluations of FANET routing protocols. We use the LARISSA architecture to guarantee the efficiency and accuracy of the whole system. We also use the model driven development methodology to provide model and code consistency through the use of formal verification tools. To complete the FANET safety validation, OMNeT++ simulations (using real UAVs mobility traces) and real FANET outdoor experiments have been carried out. We confront both results to evaluate routing protocol performances and conclude about its safety consideration.

[1]  Emerson Alberto Marconato LARISSA: Layered architecture model for interconnection of systems in UAS , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[2]  Robert S. Hanmer,et al.  Comparing reliability and security: Concepts, requirements, and techniques , 2007, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[3]  Ilker Bekmezci,et al.  Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey , 2013, Ad Hoc Networks.

[4]  Anil Kumar Verma,et al.  Experimental analysis of AODV, DSDV and OLSR routing protocol for flying adhoc networks (FANETs) , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT).

[5]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  Communication architectures and protocols for networking unmanned aerial vehicles , 2013, 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[6]  Ozgur Koray Sahingoz,et al.  Mobile networking with UAVs: Opportunities and challenges , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[7]  Manuel Béjar,et al.  Model-Based Design, Development and Validation for UAS Critical Software , 2012, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[8]  Nicolas Larrieu How can model driven development approaches improve the certification process for UAS? , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[9]  Nicolas Larrieu,et al.  Joint Model-Driven design and real experiment-based validation for a secure UAV Ad hoc Network routing protocol , 2016, 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS).

[10]  Nicolas Larrieu,et al.  Secure routing protocol design for UAV Ad hoc NETworks , 2015, 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[11]  Yannick Moy,et al.  Testing or Formal Verification: DO-178C Alternatives and Industrial Experience , 2013, IEEE Software.

[12]  Reinhard Gotzhein,et al.  Model-driven Development of Complex Routing Protocols with SDL-MDD , 2008 .