Removal of indicator bacteriophages from municipal wastewater by a full-scale membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process: implications to water reuse.

The effectiveness of a full scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) in the removal of bacteriophages and bacterial fecal indicators from municipal wastewater was compared with that obtained by conventional activated sludge process (CASP). Somatic coliphages (SOMCPH) and F-RNA specific bacteriophages (FRNAPH) were always detected in the pre-treated effluent (mean: 6Log10), while phages infecting Bacteroides fragilis were not always present (mean: 3.9Log10). The MBR process was able to achieve respectively 2.7 and 1.7Log10 higher reductions of SOMCPH and FRNAPH compared to CASP (significant differences: P<0.05). SOMCPH were found to be the most suitable indicators for assessing MBR performance, since they showed greater resistance to biofiltration than FRNAPH and a more regular distribution in pre-treated effluent than BFRAGPH. Moreover, since the traditional bacterial indicators were almost totally removed by biofiltration, SOMCPH proved to be the best indicators to evaluate the microbiological risk when MBR effluent is discharged into natural waters or reused.

[1]  F. Taghipour.  Ultraviolet and ionizing radiation for microorganism inactivation. , 2004, Water research.

[2]  G. Oron,et al.  Adsorption and survival of faecal coliforms, somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA phages in soil irrigated with wastewater. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  J. Jofre,et al.  Factors influencing the replication of somatic coliphages in the water environment , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[4]  K. Farahbakhsh,et al.  Removal of native coliphages and coliform bacteria from municipal wastewater by various wastewater treatment processes: implications to water reuse. , 2007, Water research.

[5]  S. Edberg,et al.  Bacteriophages as indicators of enteric viruses and public health risk in groundwaters , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  L. Schwartzbrod,et al.  Survival of infectious Poliovirus-1 in river water compared to the persistence of somatic coliphages, thermotolerant coliforms and Poliovirus-1 genome. , 2004, Water research.

[7]  Hajime Unno,et al.  The roles of microbes in the removal and inactivation of viruses in a biological wastewater treatment system , 1996 .

[8]  J. Bohatier,et al.  Comparison of bacteriophage and enteric virus removal in pilot scale activated sludge plants , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  Terry M. Gellner,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of membrane bioreactors, conventional secondary treatment, and chlorine and UV disinfection to remove microorganisms from municipal wastewaters. , 2012, Water research.

[10]  B Björlenius,et al.  Removal of viruses, parasitic protozoa and microbial indicators in conventional and membrane processes in a wastewater pilot plant. , 2006, Water research.

[11]  J. Jofre,et al.  Occurrence and levels of indicator bacteriophages in bathing waters throughout Europe. , 2002, Water research.

[12]  G. de Luca,et al.  Performance of a full-scale membrane bioreactor system in treating municipal wastewater for reuse purposes. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[13]  H. Heinonen‐Tanski,et al.  Peracetic acid (PAA) disinfection of primary, secondary and tertiary treated municipal wastewaters. , 2005, Water research.

[14]  K. Dietz,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Infectious Disease Risks from Bathing in Fresh Recreational Waters in Relation to the Concentration of Escherichia coli, Intestinal Enterococci, Clostridium perfringens, and Somatic Coliphages , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  S. Stampi,et al.  Disinfection Efficiency of Peracetic Acid (PAA): Inactivation of Coliphages and Bacterial Indicators in a Municipal Wastewater Plant , 2007, Environmental technology.

[16]  R. Sacchetti,et al.  Microbe removal in secondary effluent by filtration , 2006, Annals of Microbiology.

[17]  S. Oota,et al.  Evaluation of MBR effluent characteristics for reuse purposes. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  C A Uijterlinde,et al.  Review on the state of science on membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  Chii Shang,et al.  Bacteriophage MS-2 removal by submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2005, Water research.

[20]  W. Grabow.  Bacteriophages: Update on application as models for viruses in water , 2004 .

[21]  Shane A Snyder,et al.  Formation of oxidation byproducts from ozonation of wastewater. , 2007, Water research.

[22]  I. Xagoraraki,et al.  Release of infectious human enteric viruses by full-scale wastewater utilities. , 2011, Water research.

[23]  Yu-hsiang Wang,et al.  Control of disinfection by-product formation using ozone-based advanced oxidation processes , 2012, Environmental technology.

[24]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Fate of indigenous bacteriophage in a membrane bioreactor , 2000 .

[25]  Joaquim Comas,et al.  Removal of microbial indicators from municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor (MBR). , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Maite Muniesa,et al.  The application of a recently isolated strain of Bacteroides (GB-124) to identify human sources of faecal pollution in a temperate river catchment. , 2007, Water research.

[27]  G. de Luca,et al.  Comparative study on the efficiency of peracetic acid and chlorine dioxide at low doses in the disinfection of urban wastewaters. , 2008, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.